what i was posting is the atheist point of view from a true atheist. I went a little deeper than your original question but your question was answered in full.
my post was not just me saying i do not have to prove anything to you. you are oversimplifying it. I provided a reason as to why the atheist does not have\need to provide a reason for disbelief in superstions.
you said something along the lines of it takes more heart or strength(something like that) to believe in superstions. i provided the reason why an atheist is not superstitious and the reasons why he does not have to provide a reason for it by stating that the burden of proof is on the believer(and it is).
long story short you got your "reasons" for an opposing\diffrent view.
I am not even going to address ann b.
Friedrich Nietzsche>ann b
last i posted in this thread because it is titled religions-YOUR OPINION.
Edit: see jin tit for tat line for line.
Bookmarks