Abortion: Your Views...

[Clint]

Is there something wrong with homosexuality?

Apparently you believe so, considering that yours is still hidden in the far back of your deep dark closet.

What's step four -- you going to compare me to Hitler?

I wasn't going to, but if you really want me to, I would have no problem doing so.

Just want to make sure that the rest of the members here, that may not be so well-versed in certain subjects, aren't misled by the ignorant ramblings of an imbecilic fool.

How sweet of you.

No, I know that because, like I said before, the majority of abortion supporters are male. Try to keep up, kid.

That can't be right. I'm a male, and you're a male, and neither one of use supports abortion. You'd think that with a statistic like "the majority of abortion supporters are male," at least one of us would support it.

Murder is intentional. Miscarriage wouldn't even be manslaughter or homicide.

Accidental manslaughter.

If you realize that a human embryo is a human, why do you deny it human rights?

Because it has yet to be born, let alone develop.

Tell me, how many times have you been pregnant?

About three or four.

You tried to make a stupid point and got called out on it. I accept your apology.

I wasn't apologizing.

I highly doubt that Hitler himself killed them, and even so, they were nobody you knew, so using your illogic, what's the big ****ing deal?

It was Hitler's plan, so he killed them, and they do mean something to be because they're the grandparents to somebody that I love. It is a big ****ing deal. I accept your apology.

No, just trying to save innocent life. Some people care about innocent life.

Some people care enough to let people decide for themselves what to do with their lives and the lives of their pregnancies.

Has it ever occurred to you that humans are the only ones physically and mentally developed enough to make such changes?

Yes, which is why they do it. Point being, they never had to resort to mass deforestation and the like.

There's more to living off the land than "knowing how to hunt".

That's the coolest thing I've heard in months.

"Fatty-cake" is a military term for things that are bad for you ... cookies, brownies, cakes, pies, candies, etc. Sorry, sometimes I slip up and use words or acronyms that most people don't get.

I don't like any of those things, either. Too much sugar.

... Did you skip over the part of the Fifth Amendment that I posted for you? Double jeopardy has nothing to do with cases, it's about people. Let me show you again.

It's about trial. Trials are cases.

So, I ask: Where in the Fifth Amendment does it ever reference double jeopardy in terms of cases, and not people?

Are there not people involved in cases? If a decision is made in any case, no matter who the case is concerning, that decision then applies to all other cases, hence double jeopardy, not just for people, but also for cases. For example, Roe v. Wade made abortion legalized. If somebody else attempts to legalize abortion, a new argument needs to be made that doesn't echo the original case argument for Roe v. Wade. It can't be the same, no matter what case it is.

If no case can be tried twice, how do you like your racially segregated schools, drinking fountains, buses, etc.? You know, seeing as how the Plessy v. Ferguson ruling upheld "seperate but equal" and was later overturned by the same court ...

A case can't be tried twice, as I explained above.

You pulled the number out of your ass. While it's not surprising that your "memory" is there too, you were, once again, called out on a bogus claim.

No. I pulled it from memory. Just because my memory doesn't serve correctly 100% of the time as yours does (or rather, as your online encyclopedia does,) doesn't mean it's bogus.

Just none presented by you.

That's correct.

Okay, let's get this straight ... I ask for credible evidence, and you repeat the same crap you've been repeating, with no evidence to back it up?

That, too, is correct.

I understand it fully. I just realize that the answer to overpopulation is the slaughter of millions of innocent children.

You could always eat your neighbors. Either way, the solution of overpopulation is murder of some kind, so why not murder humans that don't yet have a will to live?

And most of them turn into drug addicts or prostitutes?

No, they just have problems. It doesn't have to be drug addiction or prostitution. Those are just the examples I used.

Give me some credible evidence that says that adopted children are more likely to be "really ****ed up", or admit that it was a stupid claim and drop it.

I didn't say adopted children. I said children that are stuck in the adoption centers until they're of legal age that don't get the proper upbringing. Learn how to read.

If "braindead" people are alive, why don't children with brain activity have the same rights?

They're not actually alive. Although it's possible to live without the brain via life support systems, it's impossible to function without the brain. If life support is taken away, the person dies. Hence, braindead is essentially dead in every sense of the word.

The child MIGHT be born with problems. And if it is, it's born with problems. Unless you're trying to argue that it's alright to kill mentally handicapped people, you don't have much of a point here.

So let the child live with pain and suffering for all of it's 75+ years, huh? That sounds like torture to me. If it was an animal, it would be euthanized out of mercy. You don't care enough for human life to do that. You're a hypocrite.