That is one of the most narrowminded, nastiest things I've ever read. How can you even take your own opinion seriously? You think that women who are raped should be forced to have the kid? You think women who have a high risk of dying during labour should have to look at all kind of alternatives, even if they still might die?
I'm fine with the fact that you're religious; that doesn't bother me, but to boarderline condone rape is pretty disgusting.
Here's a news flash; accidents happen. Rape is no accident; therefore it shouldn't even be bought into the equation. Abortions are availble to women in most places for a reason; there are a lot of unwanted pregnancies out there.
Moving on...
Do I believe that women should be made to face up to their mistakes? To an extent, yes. But do I believe an unwanted baby should suffer under parents who don't want it? No, I don't. Women shouldn't have to go through having to give their child away just because people think they should go through with the pregnancy.
If women want to go through with the pregnancy and put the baby up for adoption, I think it's a very nice thing to do. But I don't think that women should have babies if they don't want to.
I do agree with some of the things that Sasquatch has said here, but I'm still pro-choice. I'm sympathetic to that possible baby... But I really can't say I'd want to have a baby right now if I made a mistake. You can call that weakminded and nasty, but I know first-hand that accidents happen; even when using sufficiant protection.
Bookmarks