Realism needs to be thrown out. Make it description or something...but this is magic, or whatever the person uses. No where did the tourny say this was to be realistic. And do not, I'm not just complaining... I got 10/10 on that. =/ Especially annoyed with Toph's score though...got docked points off this for staying true to her character...?

Your technique kept me feeling fascinated, I was anticipating the next post but it never came, hence -1 mark, also another mark was lost due to the dark purple's usage. A more neutral colour would've been better owing to the bulk of TFF using the 'Dark' Skin
-1 for not posting? How's that have to do with technique? Also, if anything, the color should be a bonus to my score. I added extra. That's my character(s) color. Almost always do that. Just cause the "bulk"(which how do you know this btw?) use dark skin isn't my problem. =/ Also, there are two people with a score for this rating, but no reason why...

I'm curious as to how Red got a higher score than me... Perhaps you need to go back and read it? He didn't attack once, and got a 4... I got a 2 for doing a basic attack(which isn't supposed to be HIGHLY detailed, but that's cool)... Xeim got a 0...due to no combat having taken place... Which I fail to understand. Loses points cause the opponent never posted? Summons aren't allowed... No where does the BA say making copies of yourself(which in Toph's case is illusion with a spell on it) is illegal. Innovative attack. Got docked points... DH, no offense...modded by cutting the "strings" to the clone(s) when no strings to them were mentioned in the post. Sorry, but adding in effects on what an opponent is doing is moddish. Don't see how DH's attacking giving little room for dodging is bad either. That's smart fighting. =/

Post flow is likewise harsh for getting a 0 for no opponent replying. Also, how can you comment I did bad by not connecting to Red's post when he MODDED in my character when I'd yet to make an intro? If anything, points should have been docked from Red for that. I had made no 2nd reply as he didn't describe the explosion(or anything resulting from that) as I had stated in my spell, nor attacked back. I can understand getting a 0 for not replying when he had.

Again, Use of Envio seemed bad... Xeim, as you say, describes it well...BUT due to their opponent not posting, you only give a 3? Not really fair when beyond their control. Myself, DH, and Toph got fairly low scores with no reason...of which, in my own opinion, we all used/described the zones quite well. =/

Penalties... No offense... Completely stupid. That's what the SCORING is for. The score should reflect the "offense" in the section it goes under... Not deducted from the point score AND get an additional hit after.

Also... Hyz. Why are you complaining about someone complaining? You're doing the same thing you're saying they shouldn't. Toph, at least, has a reason for it. Your post could be considered flame baiting since you're complaining about their post for, basically, no reason. =/