Abortion: Your Views...

[RamesesII]

The only point I would like to object to this one is the first bullet on your list. But then again to everyone is intitled to their opinion and I am not saying you are wrong by anymeans.

There are only 2 ways to be safe about not getting someone pregnant, that would to be to abstain from having sex or permanant sterilization. That's it, any other form of birth control being used has a human factor involved with it and is not a guarenteed form of birth control.

Knowing this the people that use contraceptives and what not should also know that there is a chance that even the most perfect condom has a less then 100% chance of success. Basicly what I am getting at here is the people having sex should know that it is not an absolute preventative for pregnancy so they assume the liability if the female becomes pregnant.

In short, in my opinion and I have said it 100 times, if you are going to have sex get ready to face the conciquances. It is a risk and the people should own up to it if they have an "accident".

Thats another term I don't understand, "an accident". Sex is suppose to be for procreation not recreation so how the hell is it an accident by any means. It is what the human body (or creature) act of mating is suppose to do.

Of course it is meant to be procreation but did you or anyone for that matter have that in mind when the first had sex, no of course not it has its different stages we do it for 'recreation' when we are in our early 20's then procreation late 20's and 30's then of course recreation after that again.

'Accident' purely refers to the fact that precautions were taking while having recreational sex and instead of hitting the 99% protection ratio we got the remaining 1%.

It also depends on what frame of mind you believe or where brought up with, teh best form of contraception is of course as you stated abstinence and there is nothing wrong with that especially if you are religious for example and believe no sex before marriage.

The financial thing Rameses said I don't so much agree with, but that's just me. If it's just a financial issue, you can give the kid up for adoption. If it was unexpected due to fauly contraceptive or something, then the other circumstances make up for it, and I'd say it's alright again, but using financial issues as a crutch to make up for irresponsibilty, that I don't totally agree with. There are many situations that could vary wtih financial issues, so in some cases I'd probably say that's good enoguh reason, in others I wouldn't.

Yeah but you may not understand for a woman having this baby grow in you for 9 months and then putting it up for adoption is extremely difficult that is why it is better off aborting in the early stage, I have many a conversation with woman and 99% say they could never give up a child for adoption after having it with them for 9 months its just their nature, and that works in the way for surrogacy as well.

Ok for example if you buy a car or something similar and you put 9 months of extremely hard labour into crafting it and taking care of it etc you don't just want to give it away at the end, now believe me that example is no where near the same concept of pregnancy.