Quote Originally Posted by M16 View Post
Would you care to cite any examples? I find that typically people are quick to paraphrase others, saying that evolutionism has no foundation, and yet they can't do anything to offer any rebuttal.
If you'd like, I could type up a larger post on it (might take me a while though as I've currently gotten a nice amount of work and the humidity is making my brain feel half dead), but two things coming into my mind are things like:

Fossil records: Most fossils found have bigger variations and the smaller steps between them if evolution was true just aren't well represented. Look up 'transitional forms' on google and there might be some interesting reads. I believe Darwin himself asked the question himself and concluded it was due to many species simply not being preserved due to their remains not ending up somewhere conveniant, but either way, a bit of reading led me to believe this can be said for pretty much all 'evolved' creatures including those in places where there likely should be preserved remains. Of course, Sequence homology and endogenous retroviruses coupled with fossil records can support evolution, but it's all sketchy at best and many scientists are quick to point that out.

Big Bang: What caused it? That I believe is the biggest hole, and not something anyone can explain (I don't think I've even heard any credible theories on it).

Top Evidences Against the Theory of Evolution

I found the page above to be an interesting source, as it goes into evidence against the Evolution theory and also conveniantly splits it's references into pro-creationism, pro-evolutionism and neutral for easy checking.