i am going to start by saying, i am deffianantly prochoice, not proabortion. i agree with sasquatch it should be the womans choice not anyone elses (with the exception of life threatening complications)
I don't know if your joking or not but you contradict yourself several times. Pro-choice = Pro-abortion, pro-choice allows the woman to abort, therefore if your pro-choice then you don't mind abortion. Thus pro-abortion.

Also Sasquatch says that he finds the fact that the woman is the only one with a say in the matter disagreeable. He wants the father to be able to support or not support the choice.

when you talk about "murdering" the fetus by means of abortion, is that the same as when a woman miscarries and her body naturally aborts the fetus? i know there is the variable of choice in that situation so i relaly dont want to hear you condem me for saying that. the point i am making here is that weather the woman conciously makes that decision or not it is going to happen.
Not all pregnancies end in miscarriages though, you say that you don't want to hear the choice argument but that's the main factor. If the doctor says that you may have a miscarriage it does not nesecarilly mean that the baby will die. Also, abortion is the interferance of a woman's womb, it's more natural for the baby to die of natural causes than for a doctor to shove surgical tools up the woman's 'birth area'.

now for more: doesnt the mother have a say so in the goings on with her body and what is contained in it, what makes it moraly wrong for her to do so? say you have a case of the crabs (i know haha yeah i said crabs..... actually no its not because im being serious) they are technicly a living organism so if you go by morality then wouldnt it also be a bad thing to get rid of your crabs?? where does the limitation to morality start and end and who made these decisions for us?????? (try to keep religion out of this one because that would be WWWAAAAAYYYYYY off topic)
A mother shouldn't be able to deny the right of life to her baby just because it is being incubated within her womb. Also, comparing a baby to pubic lice isn't the best metaphor in the world, by definition, 'murder' is the killing of another human being. Killing pubic lice is not murder, whilst killing an unborn baby is.


now im getting back on my opinion, thats all it is BTW. like i previously stated it should be the mothers choice, as for reasoning it should be one of the 3 that have been stated 100 times over and over again. but all in all since i think it is the womans choice then i shall not pass judgement on her if she decides to do so its her body let her do what she wants with it.........

once again im done rambleing.....
Now consider this for a moment, by comitting abortion you are terminating the life of a human being. This human being has a practically unrestricted potential and could grow up to be a lawyer, a doctor, a famous sports personallity. By killing off the fetus, you could be killing off the cure for cancer, the method for practical time travel, the solution to world poverty. Not only is abortion murdering the unborn child, it could also be the deciding factor for millions of lives. You shouldn't be allowed to take that chance, even if abortion wasn't murder to begin with.