Aurora, Colorado: 12 Dead in Shooting Rampage at Midnight Showing of The Dark Knight Rises Read mor

[Order]

FYI, I'm a lefty so I hope this isn't to De-evolved for you Order.

Horribly so.

were murdered because of some stupid 'need' for guns.

Oh, is that why he did it?
Because he had a gun lying around and thought, 'why the hell not?'
All this time I thought it was because he was a psychopath, but it turns out, thats what happens when a gun is nearby.

Oh, snap! My .45 is right here on the coffee table, excuse me, I am now obligated to go on a rampage. Back in a few.


You're a moron.

people are so quick to use a weapon on someone for petty reasons

You're still a moron.
The point is self-defense is the last choice on a long list of other options. Nit picking specific scenarios presented aside.
There is nothing noble about gun control.
It changes nothing.
Look at California which has some strict laws for the US. There are gang-related shootings there on a daily basis.

You are not promoting a morally good cause by wanting more gun control in the US.
You are just another bleeding heart who doesnt take the time to understand that the culture and the country you are talking about is not like your own. Your ideas are clearly poorly thought out on the topic, but you don't know that because you arent american.

Besides, gun control did nothing to effect Britan's rate of violent crimes but increase them.
Evidence was previously provided, yet to be discredited.

Youre about as wrong as you can get while still standing on the same planet.

[Sheechiibii]

Oh, is that why he did it?
Because he had a gun lying around and thought, 'why the hell not?'
All this time I thought it was because he was a psychopath, but it turns out, thats what happens when a gun is nearby.

Could he have caused that distruction without the weapons your country hands out? No. No matter what mental state, without the resources mass murder like this cannot happen.

There is nothing noble about gun control.
It changes nothing.

Apart from lessening the chances of massacres you mean? Of course that's not noble at all. Don't you know what logic is? If someone wants to kill 15 people and injure 50 in the space of a few minutes how do they do that? In a country that gives people guns left right and centre it's extremely easy. There is no argument for that.

[Hobaginator]

Could he have caused that distruction without the weapons your country hands out? No. No matter what mental state, without the resources mass murder like this cannot happen.

Yes, with home made bombs like the ones in his apartment. You think guns are the only way to quickly kill a shitload of people? Wrong.

Apart from lessening the chances of massacres you mean? Of course that's not noble at all. Don't you know what logic is? If someone wants to kill 15 people and injure 50 in the space of a few minutes how do they do that? In a country that gives people guns left right and centre it's extremely easy. There is no argument for that.

Unless he uses bombs instead, which he could have, and more people could have been killed. Or he could have blocked off exits and set the building on fire. Or he could have thrown a few molotov cocktails in the theater and stood in the only open exit with a chain saw and a bomb strapped to his chest. Or he could have used nerve gas. Or he could have driven a dump truck through the wall with a pipe bomb under the gas tank. Or he could have put poison in the drink machine.

Would you like me to continue showing you why your opinion is invalid?