Instead of massing a wall of text , I will instead give a very brief description of what Is going on and then embed the only 2 videos I believe you need to see to be able to make your judgements. Russel Brand is mostly known for being a comedian and for appearing in several comedy films such as 'Forgetting Sarah Marshal' and 'Get him to the Greek' as Aldus Snow. But what you may not know is that Russel Brand was an aggressive drug addict who is currently striving for reforms in the way addicts are not only viewed, but treated. He also detests our current form of government and blames the government for the way addicts end up. Russel Brand is a profoundly exceptional speaker and I do give him great kudos for his quick reponses and his articulation with words, but In my opinion, like many I have seen in various debates before, Russel brand is an expert at speaking without actually saying anything. His views are skewed. He sugguests the current government be abolished and that he wants a revolution. All the while whilst never actually sugguesting a system to replace our current form of government, thus leading to anarchy. I dont doubt his sincerity, he is obviously very passionate about what he is talking about, but it seems his emotions are fueling his desires and that what he is sugguesting is dysfunctional. He is also very rude to his hosts.







This interview is also quite interesting. Peter hitchens is a respected journalist and has a difficult time dealing with Russels lack of integrity.




Does Russel Brand have what it takes to start a revolution? Or is he a man without a plan. You be the judge.


edit: wow, I mispelled genius. Kill me now.