Yeah, another unavoidably heated argument occured on facebook again, but this time some of his friends jumped in and gave me a few likes on some of my responses, I dont think he liked that because it was only then the critisisms started coming out. This is the comment that won me the day:

"I dont need jesus or religion to be a good person. To judge someone based on that, is small minded and really offensive. Is that what jesus teaches? Also the majority of Earths population actually believes in god; which makes no sense toward your claims. And even most religious organisations adopt evolution because it is as solid a theory as gravity, these days. If it was otherwise, then science is the kind of practice that would welcome the challenge. Unlike religion, science only cares about DATA and what is likely to be true. I know you dont like hearing it Mt.J, but I only care about whats likely to be true. You cannot disprove that I have an invisible pink penguin, but that doesnt mean you should believe it. Demand the same standard of evidence and show me examples and I will take on that info, but dont show me biased videos made by fundementalist creationists. So far nothing you've posted has come from a skeptical point of view, its always been "ANOTHER athiest DESTROYED AGAIN in debate" or "Evolution proved WRONG AGAIN".

To put it simpler Mr.J, I dont trust ANYONE who claims to have found truth.

In response to your second comment, you are not wrong. Evolution is a theory. So is gravity. Just think about that for a moment, yeah? Because whilst gravity is a theory, it is most certainly represented by facts (dropping something supports the theory of gravity). Your argument to this has always been that science disproves evolution. What I am saying is that if science did DISPROVE evolution (science never sets out to disprove anything btw), you would need to convince me by citing a legitimate source. But something as outrageous as evolution being a "lie" and being "proved wrong by science" is something we would certainly know about since science is always the first to admit its wrong. I believe that not because I am brainwashed, but because of years of amazing awe inspiring sceintific progress. I am astonished that one could be so critical of the progress science has made, and yet even more critical of pehaps the most greatest of sciences which has been only possible due to the theory of evolution."

After the envital 70 comments that followed, we all agreed to drop it. I think I'll take your advice and just ignore it next time. As I still couldn't get through to him.