No Backwards Compatibility??

[Jin]

Jin, it's called not knowing about it. -_-;
Instead of beating around the bush, just call me out on not knowing it like Cesar does. >.>;

Was I beating around the bush? I thought I quite clearly stated that you're an idiot. If you don't know what's going on, why pretend you do by making bold statements that include words like "never"?

For the 360 you have to pay just to get online (Wrong, there's Xbox Live Silver, which is totally free. Game Add-ons, messaging, Live Arcade... Gold only enables online play. "Getting Online" doesn't cost a dime.)
You're arguing semantics. You know damn well that Meier Link was referring to online play when he made that statement.

The PSN is FREE to gain access to. (With only a handful of games worth playing online...)
This statement is completely subjective and baseless. Nearly every third party game is multiplatform these days and the PS3 exclusives with online play, while maybe not as good in your opinion to that of the 360, cannot simply be brushed aside. If the 360 and PS3 "worthy games to play online" libraries are handfuls of sand, you'd have to count individual grains to determine which is superior.

Most of the titles on PSN are lower cost then Wii or 360 (You may be right there about the Wii, I wouldn't know, but there's a ton of games on Live Arcade for $5-$10. Some are even free.)
[b]I don't really have any qualms with this statement, though it's probably a mistake to include the user created games in that calculation, if you were doing so.[b]

Don't think me some hardcore PS3 fanboy, since I play Xbox quite a bit. I just get tired of the "PS3 has no good games" bullshit, especially now that 90% of games are multiplatform.