If I would be cut off the internet and exchanged by another warrior, I would not accept that my character is killed in the case that my spare loses. At least not if this rule is introduced after the war started.
If I would be cut off the internet and exchanged by another warrior, I would not accept that my character is killed in the case that my spare loses. At least not if this rule is introduced after the war started.
Indeed, in my honest opinion this is nothing but bullshit. If an exchange warrior looses, it is he who looses not the original warrior. Why you even bother and even thought about this in the first place is quite ridiculous to me.
Can we just get this over with, without changing the rules? To compare.. It would be like if FIA changed the rules about F1 in the middle of a race, guys. Seriously this is just...
Bookmarks