Unknown Entity
Only plays for sport

Ahh crap you misunderstood. I was talking about men liking anal sex.

And you are partially right in the fetish department. Having anal sex isn't natural and is considered a fetish, however, the common nominate of fetish is sexual acts with non sexual objects and since anal sex is so common for what ever reason, it can be looked at as normal...
It really isn't.

That's why I won't get into the two subjects I said, because they are iffy.

And you need to apply extra pressure than what is the nominate.

Oh, well, I don't understand why some guys like anal ex with women, it doesn't make sense really, wouldn't it be the same as with men...? O.o
THat would be considered as a fetish.

THere is no sexual nerves in the anus. THe prostate is not in the anus, but you can "stimulate" it from applying pressure, not from average anal sex.
*laughs awkwardly*
The guys who don't mind them simply to that, don't pay attention to them, which can point out certain mental flaws but I can't get into that.
I said I don't think it is right for anybody to make out in public, and actually, I don't, honestly, think it is sexy when two girls make out, it is weird.
Same thing about gay men, again, I won't get into it but there is a massive study which is claiming that being Bi-sexual isn't a set sexual preference.

Anal sex is PROVEN not to have any sexual stimulation other than psychological effects soooo.
A male with a fetish for other male genitalia is not considered "Straight."
Because it is disgusting. Two guys m,aking out. You will not understand because you are female. And I am guessing that you are Bi. Men don't want to see other men making out, it dusgusts us. Plain and simple, point blank. We like women, so we wouldn't naturally get offended when two women make out to an extent. I said that I don't like public displays of affection, but a male will piss me off. Personal preference. But male gays will undoubtly have a harder time than women.

Easily. I've met plenty of people like that before, oddly enough it's been the religious-extremists for the most part, but I suppose not every person of religion can be level-headed.

I guess it's a personallity thing, if chavs were capable of full-conversation and discussion I'd imagine they would be in the same situation, it's a state-of-mind thing.

I used china as it is the largest area of land, which would require the most amount of bombs obviously, As a significant factor of war is simply outlasting your opponent, I find that having a massive supply of WMDs to be a very effective and brilliant military tactic, the mere idea that as an opponent to the U.S will NEVER be able to outlast the weapon supply of the US is an excellent way to prevent full scale war.

I do not think you hate the US, and I only attack your ideologies because that is what you do with free speech, in attempt to sway and strengthen your own

Hey,

I posted in the Bush ID thread again, I wanted to directly ask you this question on its own, but it is also in my post, however it is lumped in with many other questions, and i have asked it a few different times yet have never gotten a response(from many people who seem to skip over it)

Anyways the question: You(and others) have criticized the US for bombing Hiroshima under the statement of millions of innocents lost. However I have presented you with the documented fact, that the US flew airplanes over Hiroshima dropping messages for everyone to see, that the US was going to destroy this place, and advising them to leave.

Since we have this fact established, how much blame can you put on the US for killing these 'innocents' and how much blame do you put on those citizens, who no doubt received the message, and chose to not flee the location?

Love the discussions

Hey just wanted to say thanks for replying to my homework thread. would you mind if i quoted you i feel i shoiuld ask first

Appreciate your time, and kindness, I'll sent everything via PM.

I'm probably pushing my luck, but I have a favor to ask. Seeing as you're great at it, is there any way you could make me a new signature, and avatar, nothing complicated really, I would provide both images, if it's not too much of a trouble that is.

Yup. The hours are great for a part-time job, not to mention the benefits I get. So life is going well for me. I feel great.

How about you? How's your life going?

Hey, it's....you. -takes an hour to check to see who you are- Oh, hey!! I've been great! Got a new job! ^^

There shouldn't be any problem with that.

Originally posted by Selcopa
Edit: Got yelled at for double posting once so we'll add on here. As it stands if Aerif can identify what parts of my posts are just propoganda and have absolutely no merit, if I am unable to defend them to have any sort of valid point I will apologize, admit I was run and pull a full reversal on my views, as it stands Aerif is simply dismissing me because they are too lazy to actually break down and analyze some of the things I say, such as my opinions on US allies current army count(despite me addressing everyone's point's in detail for everybody else)

Kick his ****ing arse for me Gemma

+ Gay the new "N" word? 1st Apr 2011 02:19 PM Unknown Entity Well put. Very well put. =D

- Gay the new "N" word? 1st Apr 2011 01:37 PM Angel of Iniquity You are stupid, plain and simple. Look at all the replies before you post ignorant fool