nix
Volatile jerk

That's ****ed up.

But I think you can still enjoy the movie though.

How come you already know the whole story of The Usual Suspects, but haven't seen it?

If someone is telling me about a movie and he would start spoiling the plot for me, I'd kick him in the head.

Hi,

I've decided to work the Movie ranking thing out in a different way. The TFF's Movie Database will be supervised and updated by yours truly.

I thought you might want to check it out and post your own Top 10:
http://thefinalfantasy.net/forums/te...-database.html

peace!

Oh, I forgot to tell you. This morning, I gave your new best friend a super official, totally authentic... warning. FYI. So either he'll stop, or he'll make for some awesome fireworks. Either way works for me.

I saw your report in my email, so I thought deleting those messages would work.. it just changed the "delete" message. Man, I am so slow right now..lol.

Have you ever seen that movie? Los Angeles gets eaten by a volcano, but TLJ just doesn't portray the drama enough for me. I mean, that film could've been a complete LOL-fest, but he tried to take it seriously. I want to fix it.

Why'd you ask?

I know how that goes, man. Both the puter crapping out on you (it's happened at least twice now to the computer I just got last Summer) and also having to use a crappy computer for the internets (I use my roommate's, and it's slow as hell. Sometimes, it makes me want to shoot myself.)

Happy birthday ^^ happy birthday to YOU!happy birthday Nix! appy birthday to you ^^

Hi! I saw that you were having a birthday, so Happy Birthday!

Happy Birthday, fellow EBG member, and all around interesting fellow.

Whichever period a book came from, it still didn't come from the beginning of time and it'd be foolish to think things any less a possibility when there's nothing to boot them from from possibly being correct. Science merely disproves things leaving the best seeming solution as what we come to think of as 'fact'. It's never completely solid, and I'd rather put my faith in an anomaly of a man that captivated the world as he did than a man of science with views I can more easily tell are flawed via gauging the reactions from a wider community to one person in general.

I don't agree with unnamed theories?
I will further investigate a theory from anyone if it makes enough sense. Personally, just looking at how some of his views concerning psychological differences between males and females which would likely have been almost pure speculation at the time leave a lot to be desired from one such as I. They weren't even at the stage they are at now where some parts of the mind can be studied better via scans and the like.

ctd from previous.

If religion is merely symbolic wish-fulfillment, what does that make other more... 'scientific' theories that also cannot be proven to be correct? And how can one such as he judge things that others may have experienced that he hadn't? Religion like neurosis? At the point I'm at, neither leave me anxious or fearful. Neither leave me as deluded as those who can't believe there might be something they haven't yet experienced out there neither...

Play nice. I don't throw accusations like yours around without doing a little more digging.

As odd as it may seem I wasn't even all that active online before a few years ago. Wikipedia wasn't where I first encountered him, though it does shorten his life quite well as well as show what things such as biographies would tell me, and those I can rarely if ever be ****ed reading. No nix, there's a place I used to frequent called the Library. I just find that I don't really agree with much of what Freud has theorised. Yes, he was a big thinker in various fields of psychology, but I even among those who are into psychology I rarely if ever hear anyone showering him solely with praise.

Quite frankly, I feel many of his ideas are outdated, and not worth half a dime in this day and age. The rest of his ideas may have some merit, but the crapulence surrounding them doesn't make me think too highly of him at all. =D

to be ctd.

'In view of the similarities and analogies, one might venture to regard obsessional neurosis as a pathalogical counter part of the formation of religion. And to describe the neurosis as an individual and religion as a universal obsessional neurosis, belief in god is the ultimate illusion

I encourage all you strong believers to read Sigmund Freud critique on religion, it is the ultimate test of faith.'

After reading several of his works (and theories) I don't know that I can take the dead fellow too seriously. Well some of his more phallocentric views anyways. Some stuff looks kind of interesting, but the rest of it leaves me thinking he was a tad looney in a non-fun sense.

Don't help he was a crackhead. True that, look it up.