Think about it this way, Matt and Jeff, being brothers and having nearly exact background training in the business of professional wrestling, are pretty much equals when it comes to in-ring ability. The only problem is, Jeff is more over with the crowd, so much so that he's won a world title, whereas, Matt has yet to win one. So, in order to be fair to the brothers, Jeff wins the WWE title, and Matt beats Jeff at Wrestlemania.Originally Posted by foster kid
See, I don't agree. JBL, although he's not the best wrestler, is very charismatic, much more than Rey Mysterio. I mean, sure, Rey has the hearts of nearly every child who watches professional wrestling, but JBL ultimately gets a bigger reaction from the audience.
There's a problem with this statement, John Cena is always winning a world championship. Three years ago, he had the WWE championship for nearly the entire year. The same thing goes for 2007, as well. If they put a title on a guy like Cena and then make him win every match for two years straight, then once it's off of him, he shouldn't be champion for at least three years after that, in order to make sure the audience doesn't get sick of him. That's probably the reason why I'm sick of Triple H, because he just refuses to lose.
Well of course. Nobody expects Triple H to lose, no matter how washed up the bastard is.
And that's because Jericho's so awesome that no words can fathom how you feel about him.
Ah, yes. Another Batista v. John Cena feud to cure my chronic insomnia.
Jeff tried to get revenge already, and he failed, so he should just leave Matt alone and allow him to win one of the world heavyweight titles. Of course, then he could take his revenge in an attempt to beat Matt for the world title. That's the kind of stuff that Edge would do, at least.
Bookmarks