The Masters

[LocoColt04]

The conditions of battle stay. It will be a 5v5 battle. We have outlined our warriors and still await yours.

I am glad to see this. Anything more would have seemed too cluttered. It also works because, as an odd number, there's no possible way for this war to come to a draw.

That sounds acceptable, though I suggest we collaborate over PM to avoid people piping in with comments and suggestions that could bog the process down. Though of course if you want deaths to be included, those can only come at the end of battle after a victor is confirmed.

This would be accurate. With ZERO godmodding allowed (excluding rules regarding strength/power; previously noted as acceptable), death would be unacceptable in that regard. It would have to be a post-judgment action, which is acceptable under the circumstances.

I suggest LocoColt as the sole judge. If you can't accept this term than you might as well retract your challenge right now. If Colt refuses to judge...then we'll naturally discuss other alternatives.

I'm down with that. We'll discuss possible time-caps and rulings at a later time. I'll want to hold a little pow-wow with the two of you so we can hammer things out and make sure we're all on the same page. It's tough, with Toro being ten hours ahead of us, Anomaly, but we'll find a way to plan out a discussion amongst ourselves.

This is really important because I will need to know what each side deems as important qualities so that we may come to a mutual agreement as to what is and is not imperative. Not everything is always judged TOA style, and sometimes it's better that it isn't. This is an epic battle with a ton of amazing visuals (at least, it should be). Therefore, character depth might not have to be important if you don't want it to be. We could discount spelling and grammar altogether, or I could be a nazi about it. There are probably a dozen other judgment-type things I look for in posts that we'll have to discuss at our conference.