Quote Originally Posted by vevuxking102 View Post
Um, okay. I don't know who ever said that, but what does that have to do with Cosmology and the Big Bang?



On Earth?

Origin of the first cell

For more information, RNA world hypothesis
For more information, Last universal ancestor

In a gene-centered view of evolution, life is regarded in terms of replicators—that is DNA molecules in the organism. In this paradigm, cells satisfy two fundamental conditions for the evolution of complexity. If freely-floating DNA molecules that code for enzymes are not enclosed in cells, the enzymes that benefit a given replicator (for example, by producing nucleotides) may do so less efficiently, and may in fact benefit competing replicators. If the entire DNA molecule of a replicator is enclosed in a cell, then the enzymes coded from the molecule will be kept close to the DNA molecule itself. The replicator will directly benefit from its encoded enzymes.

Biochemically, cell-like spheroids formed by proteinoids are observed by heating amino acids with phosphoric acid as a catalyst. They bear many of the basic features provided by cell membranes. Proteinoid-based protocells enclosing RNA molecules may have been the first cellular life forms on Earth. Some amphiphiles have the tendency to spontaneously form membranes in water. A spherically closed membrane contains water and is a hypothetical precursor to the modern cell membrane composed of proteins and phospholipid bilayer membranes.[11]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cell_%2...igins_of_cells



Most people who advocate Scientific theories will tell you there is no reason why, and that's fine an all. But I, as a Christian believe Yahweh God created us so we could worship him and so he could punish us.



And who said that? And honestly, if you're going to argue about scientific facts, use science, not your own ideas. I'm not going to argue about your own ideas about things. And also, give proof. Give me links, citations, sources, etc.



Which theories are you referring to?

How can someone who's discovering information about the universe be fearing the unknown? Isn't that the complete opposite?


I'm getting tired going back through and quoting everything so I'm going to just write it at the bottom.



Through this whole thing, you deny the possibility that things can cross each other, viewing everything as separate things, all unrelated within this plane of existence, yet the universe could never exist without connecting. They're not separated by some wall of facts, they interact with each other. It's basic Physics. An idea is only an idea if it never reacts and interacts with the things around it. Again basic Physics.


A person denying the theories of others is not. That's the point, you fear the unknown closing your mind to possibility and reason. You don't know it, so you deny it's possibility of my theories and the theories of others. Again, why do you fear and deny the theories that you choose to deny as possibility?