Are People too Sensitive?

[Govinda]

Of course, people are becoming too sensitive. We're in an age where Victicrats (i.e. a person(s) claiming to be victims in practically every part of their life, such as: feminist, black Americans, homosexuals, etc.) run the mainstream media and are gaining more power as they bully people into submission so that they can justify their immature and irrational behavior. You can't disagree with these people without being labeled and cooperation is all but non-existent unless you do it their way, even if their way is wrong (e.g. a business decision).

You're a white male saying some girl doesn't look pretty? You're a sexist. You a white person saying you don't like a specific black person for a non-racial reason? You're a racist. In the end, it's all about them and their opinion. You're just a second-rate citizen with an insulting label that has no right to have an opinion if it's not the right opinion.

Political correctness creates an illusion in reality and breeds a never-ending cycle of excuses and accusations without addressing the truth and reality of whatever issue is brought up. Like such illusions as white male privilege (and not to mention are oppressive) or that white people in general are a privileged race. Worst of all is these people who believe in these illusions go beyond all logic and reason and arguing is not like talking to a wall, but a giant castle with an array of built-in defenses on every stone. They believe so profoundly into such philosophical and victicratic lies that nothing else matters and it becomes a sense of religion with their own version of the ten commandments. In the end, they become the very thing they hate.

So the answer to your question is most definitely, yes. It reminds of a card from this 90's board game called 'Illuminati' where the card is titled "Kill for Peace" with a picture of a hippie standing over an injured police man. In this case, it's more like "Facism for Peace" where you have absolutely no constitutional right to disagree, have an opinion, or live a life they deem unacceptable (mind you, these people are so delusional that they'll say that you're wrong and you are entitled such rights, while at the same time dismissing your rights as misunderstandings or lies). Like in that futuristic Sylvester Stallone movie, "Demolition Man", in which he awoke to a future where sex, salt, meat, bad language, violence, and practically everything a liberal hates or whines about is banned, period.

Anyway, I hope my post was informing for you.

I'm a liberal. Most of us dig sex, salt, meat and swearing. And you like there being violence in the world?

You complain about victimisation. You sound like you think you're being victimised. How exactly are your rights being taken from you? I don't understand your post.

'Political correctness creates an illusion in reality and breeds a never-ending cycle of excuses and accusations without addressing the truth and reality of whatever issue is brought up.'

Where does this leave actual hate crimes? They do exist, and laws need to be kept to attempt their prevention. And as far as I'm concerned, political correctness does address the actual issues - it's saying to a gay person that while their sexual orientation was illegal for many years in the West, they are free to do as they please now, and that they won't be judged for it.


'In the end, it's all about them and their opinion. You're just a second-rate citizen with an insulting label that has no right to have an opinion if it's not the right opinion.'


And here, you excellently sum up the real situation of women, gays and blacks until a few decades ago. Do not try to claim that white males or females face a life like that these days. I'm not sure if you're saying that or not; the 'you're' in your sentence isn't defined clearly.


'They believe so profoundly into such philosophical and victicratic lies that nothing else matters and it becomes a sense of religion with their own version of the ten commandments. In the end, they become the very thing they hate.'


So you hate intolerance, while not being able to tolerate liberals. Admirable. But I repeat: it's all about stereotypes. Calling a woman weak and emotional, a gay man corrupted, or a black person untrustworthy perpetuates a harmful stereotype that really has no place in the modern world. Don't get me wrong - I know women who are weak and emotional, a gay guy who irritates me with his bullshit every time we speak, and one of the Nigerians at my boyfriend's work was a thief. I would not hesitate to call them weak, aresholes, or a thief because that is what they are. I wouldn't be punished if I did, because I'd be stating a fact about their lives.

It's the difference between, 'Eric, one of the guys at my boyfriend's work stole the whole pile of lottery cards' and 'Eric, that Nigerian guy at my boyfriend's work, stole all the lottery cards'. The former sentence reports the crime; the latter reports the crime and suggests that it had something to do with his being Nigerian. His nationality had **** all to do with it. Do you see?