How often do you go back and read old topics?

[Alpha]

I'm going to go back and read this topic when I'm in the future because this will become the greatest thread of all time.


Of ALL TIME!

If that's the case, then I better post. Your life is not complete without me.

I don't read old posts, well, maybe old as in a week, two weeks tops, but no longer. What's the point? I only read around 25% of new threads (FYI make an intriguing thread title and I will read it), unless they're made by someone I am fond of, in which case I will read them regardless.

The other exception is if there is a necropost. If it's a really raging necropost, I like to write up a big bitch about it in the text box, and then erase it when it becomes too mean. FYI, just read the ****ing date on the post above you.

Anything by Client Eastwood is a winner.

[DragonHeart]

Just don't hit post accidentally, that would be, er, interesting.

Every once in awhile I will necropost on purpose if I have a question or an update or whatever. Particularly if it's a topic that comes up every few years anyways, why clutter up the forum with a new one when I can just bring the last one back up? Necroposting isn't inherently bad as long as it's not done for stupid reasons.

~DragonHeart~

[Unlucky Rufus]

What I wanna know is why Unlucky Rufus keeps spelling "Clint" with an "e," thus making it an improper noun that even sounds different. I like Client Eastwood, though. It makes me smile.

Thank you captain grammar, why don't we just call him Clinton Eastwood Jr. since thats his full name. (jerk..)


I'm just joshin, i don't actually know why i spelled Clint like Client. I was probably lacking brain power yesterday thanks to watching 5 minutes of Dane Cook's stand up. (let's hope he's not a member too..)