Results 1 to 30 of 54

Thread: The day the ID died

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #11
    #LOCKE4GOD The day the ID died Alpha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand
    Age
    34
    Posts
    1,917
    Blog Entries
    59

    Re: The day the ID died

    Quote Originally Posted by T.G. Oskar View Post
    But that doesn't mean people that can write 8-10 page research reports in hours will end up being good at ID. Some themes (and some responses!) can be pretty intimidating.

    Also...why it is that when I see the title of the topic, I get reminded of Chrono Trigger? Given that it's an attempt to revive and motivate ID, shouldn't the topic be renamed "the day the ID revived"?
    I was more thinking along the lines of "The day the music died". I thought today that I perhaps should have made it "Show me your ID". Ahh, the art of witty thread titles.

    OK, so some themes can be intimidating. Sure. But how do you respond to that? Stop making 'intimidating' threads?

    @Soldier: Is your suggestion to use GC for the purpose of ID? Are you saying that ID is redundant, or just that if we want people to participate, we should allow people to "do GC" in an "ID topic"? (I have no idea what either of those things really are, but bare with me.)

    All this talk of "constructive arguments" and so on... would it not just be redundant when we have people coming in and throwing some 4chan image into the debate?

    At the end of the day, Soldier, ID and GC are functionally separate. They are not necessarily discrete, but you can't deny that the separation serves a purpose.

    Or perhaps you weren't suggesting that. Clarification?

    With respect to 'referencing'... An opinion doesn't need a reference, provided it's one's own. Given that most ID topics deal in perspective and normative positions, citations are useless unless quoting, or giving facts. Even then, you can't trust the Internet (so hyperlinks are redundant), and no one is actually going to check hard-copy references.

    If I reference, I do it to acknowledges someone else's work. That's courtesy; the purpose is not academic. I just finished (yussssssss!!!) a 2000-word essay on urbanisation in the underdeveloped world, with 25 different publications cited. There is simply no need for that on the Internet.

    While a citation isn't going to harm anyone, they seem more than a bit superfluous.
    Last edited by Alpha; 09-26-2010 at 10:03 PM.


Similar Threads

  1. Favorite Lryics
    By GHOSTED in forum Music
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 10-24-2010, 07:34 PM
  2. Email about the Iwo Jima Memorial
    By Kaiden in forum General Chat
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-18-2010, 02:20 PM
  3. Rest in peace my precious little one...
    By Omega Weapon in forum General Chat
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-10-2008, 06:19 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •