I was half-joking. Most posts in ID do not contain citations and so the same points tend to be argued a lot. It's all as well though since people can just as easily question the citations. Chances are if they're actively involved in ID they're not about to back down. There is almost never a source unbiased enough that the opposing view will acknowledge.

The only thing I want to get across is that the vast majority rarely have any interest in getting into heavy-handed debates, citing what they say, and generally being "good at ID."