It was a bullshit gesture. I'm pretty sure on his first day on the job, he wound up killing 30-some innocents in a bombing gone awry. I think that he only won the prize because he wasn't Bush, who the global community considered a warmonger. So by default, he was given the prize because he wasn't a "warmonger." It's just liberals patting other liberals on the back for being liberal. You can even look at it as a not so subtle **** you to conservatives. The only thing Obama has done in his 9 months of presidency is check out a few sporting events and hasn't done a damn thing for peaceful change.
So far "peace" includes:
Killing innocents with drones.
Saying he will disregard borders to kill Al Qaeda*
Still pandering to Israel and helping to cover up attacks
Heating up the war in Afghanistan*
Practically invading Pakistan*
What's even stranger is that the nomination period ended 2 weeks into his presidency. I don't think he even had his stuff out of boxes at this point.
Hell, I haven't killed any Afghanis, should I be considered for a Peace Prize? I've done a lot more towards establishing peace in my own neighborhood. Such gestures include:
NOT flipping people off while driving anymore.
NOT slashing the tires of the dude who parallel parks like he's playing bumper cars.
NOT decking the guy who tried to start a fight at a bar the other night.
*I'm all for these things, but I'm making a point.




























. And yes, I got gunpowder and dynamite mixed up, oops. I only associate Nobel with gunpowder because he filled my local beaches with it. Dynamite still blows people up. He may have been trying to turn himself around, trying to make something good come of something bad, and for that, fair play to him. But still.


Bookmarks