ZOMG! A SPIDER! Get it, get it, GET IT!

[Chez Daja]

So since you think that it's right, then you think that it's possible to get AIDS from a mosquito? I said that you and I both know that it's wrong, and that's where I made my error, because you obviously think that it's right. Don't mind me saying, but you're kind of weird, in a double-talking, contradiction yourself kind of way.

Oh wow, you're still going on about this. Okay. I know I'm right -- I know you're wrong. I know you're a hypocrite. You never admitted mistakes, unless I've missed something -- I'm pretty sure I didn't. I'm not the one that double-talks -- that's another example of your hypocritical personality. End of that story.

Has anybody ever told you that you're a narcissist? Well, you are. You see, you got pissed at me, which is exactly the reason for the hate comment in your last post to me, and now, because you don't want to fall prey to my genius game of pissing you off, you deny that you were ever angry, hence inflating your already over-inflated ego even more.

Hate comment or just the fact that I royally owned you? The latter. At least the rest of us usually admit when we've ****ed up -- you never did. What you just said is an exact reflection of yourself. And yeah, I have an ego -- most people do. You do as well -- calling your posts genius? No. I'm sorry, but no. I haven't read one of your posts where you're effectively putting a point across in a single post and that counts for other threads, too.

You still don't understand me. Okay, so I've already told you that I like pissing people off (a fact which you obviously completely ignored,)

Why should I listen to a word you say? You are implying that I should take your comments into account? No. I only take peoples' opinions into their account when they prove themselves to be worth listening to. You probably are, but not to me specifically.

Most of the time, when I'm being serious with my posts, are moments like these, when I have to explain every petty detail of my comments to people like you, who take literally everything at face value. Since you're like this, I'm assuming that you absolutely cannot stand metaphors, considering that they wouldn't process in your head, and therefore, wouldn't make any sense whatsoever.

Or perhaps you do not understand that not everybody on the Internet wants to listen to you and not everybody believes your tripe and the supposed "jokes" you like to tell so often. I'm sorry but if you're really that sure of yourself, then you should probably tell one of your friends, or somebody who's interested in getting to know you.
You have no knowledge of who I am, and therefore you can assume nothing effectively, and vice versa, yet we still do. See what I'm saying? I'm sure that if there's anything we could agree on, it could PROBABLY be that.

You've "lolled?" So, you've moved very awkwardly with slouched posture several times while reading this thread?

The joker has refused to understand the Internet usage of "lolled", therefore putting himself in the same position that he claims I am in. Anybody else seeing the hypocrisy here? Maybe you're new to the Internet.

Bugs don't like you.

Odeer.

You do have one thing you can be proud of though, Egon; I can't be bothered even reading your posts anymore because they're just filled to the brim with hypocrisy, excuses and repetitive jabbering. You have succeeded in becoming boring. Well done.
You seem to think counteracting my posts with excuses is going to change something or encourage me to see your points. Not going to happen.
I refuse to respond to you within this thread -- owning you in such huge volume each time I post is beginning to become embarrassing. (Another spectacle of my huge "ego".) But in more seriousness; I have much to do and have argued my points again and again and this thread now holds little to no relevence of what it once was. It shouldn't be anybodies' job to derail, so I apologise to the thread starter. I am not responding to this thread again -- I've not really done a good job of restoring the original topic after all.

That said; I hope any possibility to future encounters will be more pleasant and less meanial than about bugs.

Hopefully now this thread can go back to it's original topic, and that if anybody has a need to respond to me about things that have little to do with the topic can PM me. Or stay here and face a possible warning from GC mods. Either way, I still have to take care of my house guest and right now, he is hungry.

dragoon, I am glad that we have come to an understanding. I will continue to encourage spiders to go outside.
Tifa, nighttime bugs? Ew. Seriously.

[Clint]

Odeer.

That isn't a word.

The joker has refused to understand the Internet usage of "lolled", therefore putting himself in the same position that he claims I am in. Anybody else seeing the hypocrisy here? Maybe you're new to the Internet.

I'm not a joker. I literally used the word in it's proper context. You've never used "loll" in a sentence before? If it's hypocrisy to respond to you at face value, then I believe you've just condescended yourself.

I thought you could. If one bites someone with AIDS, then they move on to someone without it, they could pass it on. In the same way a AIDS positive druggie shares needles. *shrugs*

The HIV virus can't survive inside of an insect, however, viruses such as Yellow fever, West Nile, and Malaria can, which is why I only used AIDS as an example for disease, because it's common and everybody knows what it is, unlike yellow fever or Malaria, which are relatively uncommon compared to HIV and AIDS, meaning that not as many people know about them. Giving my "contradiction" and "hypocrisy," as Chaz Daha put it, water to hold.

Okay, seriously... wtf? When I saw the post count for this thread, I thought there was a real good debate going on. But... whats with... this? It's gone off topic.

I didn't do it.