Ironman

[Rocky]

Iron man was pretty awesome in my opinion, but I am a bad movie critic so idk! I am not much in tune with the marvel universe so I can't say whether it was accurate or not, but it seemed like the actor for Tony Stark did a nice job bringing out the smart alpha-male type of character he was supposed to be. A lot of the moments in the movie had me laughing aloud with all the A-grade body language and situational dialogue that went along with the characters, which made some parts of the movie that were vulnerable to bad humor seem funny. I think some of the acting went over the top during the final showdown, that seemed corny to me. Otherwise it was a very good movie, I reccomend seeing it in theaters.

[CowboysFromHell]

I saw this movie and hate to say it but this movie sucked bad. I'll give it 5 out of 10. The movie had too much boring crap and had no action at all. I really can't believe people saying thsi movie was good. The movie was almost 2 hours long and you will see like 5 minute action after like 1 hour and 15 minutes then at the end you see another 10 minutes of action and thats pretty much it...the movie was lame and boring. I mean come on..movies like transformers 2007 or Robocop in 1987 was way better than this movie.

[Itachi Uchiha]

I have general knowledge of the Marvel universe from some bits i saw whilst growing up and seeing the older ones on the odd late evening back then. So when i saw that I clicked onto the eight rings reference and assumed they would be in it. As proved wrong, my assumption is that there will be a sequel as most people are saying

As for the film itself, I didn't like how it was advertised but some of my mates wanted to watch it and do I tagged along. Surprisingly (like in the review and with other members) I enjoyed it. It was better than previous Marvel films. I liked the background of Stark as it seemed better than other hero background. I mean look at Spiderman: He gets bit by a spider and gains powers. He shows these in some clueless way in his school and no one can put two and two together to work it out *sigh* Ironman's background was on par with the Batman one which in its own right was a brilliant film.

But anyone, I talk too much. The film, the action and everything was awesome to the extent I would go to watch it again without second thought.

[CowboysFromHell]

I'm suprise to hear people saying this movie even had action. Uhh what action? There are only 3 action parts in this movie, the beginning, where he wears the suit for the first time and like you gotta wait about an hour until you see another action which lasted only like 5 minutes (this was the only good action part of the movie) and at the end of the movie where he fights the another suit. If you combine all that its only like 15 minutes of action, not to mentioned that the movie was 2 hours long. This movie has no action. Robot fighting movies like robocop back in late 80s and early 90s was far beter than ironman

[Sinister]

That's because people's definitions of action and what is important in what they consider a good movie are not the same. I admit that the movie Ironman did not have protracted battle scenes like other Marvel movies. But then, that's not what I was looking for in it. I got exactly what I wanted out of it. You may find that the next one will have more time for action, seeing that it doesn't have to set up backstory.

Or maybe it's just not for you.

-Sin