
Originally Posted by
Sasquatch
Since I disagree with homosexuality, no. Either way, my point was that words become slurs and insults, while their original intention was never meant to be that.
A few decades ago, black people would have been offended to be called anything but "negro". "Chinaman" was a common term and not a slur. You use either of these terms nowadays, and you'll be branded a racist.
On the other hand, "nigger", which was (and, to some extent, still is) a racial slur in recent history, has now become not just a slur, but a label -- it's only a socially acceptable label if used in the right context, or by the right people. Depending on who says it, it can be a racist label and a generalization for black people, or it could be a specific name used to refer to one black person. "Nigger-rigging" and "jury-rigging" are the same thing, along with "African engineering" and "Appalachian engineering".
The point is that languages, especially specific words in a language, evolve. Why is it that homosexuals are upset at the evolution of "their words", but fail to realize that they forced the evolution of some words to make them "theirs" in the first place?
EDIT: I don't know if it's because of the post or simply the statement that I disagree with homosexuality, but to the person who gave me negative rep, the entire four points you gave me doesn't count much. Thanks anyway.
Bookmarks