Quote Originally Posted by midgetbob
Though, with how you're arguing about it... I could make a just as arbitrary argument. Them testing to see if you're on drugs is an invasion of privacy. They can use public record to see if you've been convicted of anything - and not hiring you because of that we'll just say is bias-ism and therefor illegal under EO law - but they can't drug test you.

See how redundant we can be if we just assume something? Maybe next time read the post. <3
Ah yes, flaming. The way you're arguing about it, I feel it nescessary to point out that your statements are a great way to advertise that you have very little to support your position, and must attempt to shift the argument away from it with pathetic attempts at insulting me. And interesting that you'd attempt to back your side with LAW while simultaneously shooting dwon LAW that doesn't support your opinion. Self-contradiction, also the clear mark of a master in the art of debate. And perhaps while on the subject of reading, care to tell me what the fifth word of the title of this thread is? I assume you can count that high, please don't feel you have to prove me wrong. I can start arguing your way from here on, or go back to using actual facts and law to support my position rather than flaming like a 9 year old. Your call.