Quote Originally Posted by Meier Link View Post
To this I will quote myself



That falls under the being an "idiot and what not" clause. At that point they are not ignorant because you have provided them with the facts, they are either:
A: not capable of understanding the concept
b: to ignorant to understand that their biased opinions are wrong
c: really just doesn't give a shite about what the real subject is

Any which way they deserve a negative "rep" if some one has taken the effort to convince them other wise on multiple occasions and they are still being an ass / idiot.
I definitely agree. If you can't step back from the situation and see from the eyes of others, you are being an idiot. Especially if you have been informed you are being one and still continue to do it. I think it's okay to negative rep someone at that point. What other cases would it be there for? (Besides being angry at someone's point of view and just abusing it)