You know the funny part? Astrologists (you know, the guys that supposedly figure your future based on the position of the starts, unlike astronomers who study stars themselves) knew this a long time ago.
And...they don't care. The publication (e-publication?) had nothing, apparently, and used a concept of adjustment that both astronomers and astrologists knew to hammer down the 13th sign pretty much no astronomers care about.
Also, funny quip: I'm a Scorpio, always been one. I was kinda bummed out about the change somewhere around 10 years ago when they published that on the local newspaper (at least as bummed as someone who doesn't care about horoscopes but that pokes fun at the elemental relationships between each), but then I noticed no astrologist cares, even the astrologist whom actually published that. Still insists I'm a weighing balance instead of a cool arachnid, but anyways... Isn't it funny that, while most signs get around 20 days, Scorpio gets only 6? You'd think Ophiuchus/Serpentarius (note that Ophiuchus comes from the Greek, while the rest of the signs are in latin, or else you'd get "Parthenos" for Virgo) would be on a neat range or perhaps relegated to special occasions, but they get prominence...
Still, there are three things you can't change: triskaidekaphobia (fear of number 13; that would make 13 signs instead of the neat 12), custom (remember what happened to the Julian calendar and its "adjustments"? People just stopped caring; ironically, the Julian calendar was the base, so it also means "just stop with changing all the stuff we know!"), and skepticism (since if astrologists can't get in agreement with each other, you really think they know your future?). Oh, and the Chinese Zodiac. Wood Ox and everything
Bookmarks