Wouldn't it be beneficial for scientists to lie to us? Take something, for example, like global warming. One scientist warms up of climate change, and then everyone flips out and starts researching why. Eventually it is researched again and again, where as before it would have been left alone. The result? Education of issues. The price? We won't trust that scientist anymore if they are wrong. But maybe that was worth that scientist's career to them?
In a perfect world, I would never endorse lying. At the same time, however, this world isn't perfect and I respect that sometimes good things can come out of it. Yes, I do have morals, but you can't
lie to yourself by thinking lying is a black and white thing that's either right or wrong.
(ps that last part was not directed towards you, Silver)
Bookmarks