I'm no racist, but...

[vevuxking102]

Since all you're trying to do is rile up a fight, I'm only going to answer a few of your questions:

And here you go again. Don't attack the argument, attack the presenter. If your argument is that the Washington Times is inaccurate, present evidence that the Washington Times is inaccurate, not that those who have something to do with it disagree, no matter how severely, with you. That would be like saying my dog is vicious, and then citing evidence that I'm crazy.

Look, I provided links to the organizations that run the Washington Times, that show how unreliable they are, so if you want to ignore that, fine by me.
I'm not doing your research for you, I provided the links. Up to you to read them. If you think the Moonies and their organizations are reliable, then fine.

You use the video game rating system in a debate?

I said, it makes it seem EC, as in it makes it seem G. What does that have to do with debating? Are you retarded or something?

And Farrakhan has indeed advocated violence for the sole purpose of intimidation.

Yes, but he's considered a joke by almost everyone in the world, and thus has no real power. He's not a threat to anyone.

He is indeed a joke, you finally say something that makes sense. But having no authority doesn't mean he has no power.

Prove he has power...

Well, let's not forget about the fifty million people in Afghanistan and Iraq that have been recently liberated

HAHAHAHAHAHA! Yes, Afganistan is such a FREE country, where you can get executed for converitng to Christianity, and it's so lovely to live in, with those lovely shacks and caves people live in there. Yep, we did a good job freeing that country.

and Iraq

When I think free and prosperous, I think Iraq.

that have been recently liberated and are now being protected

Afganies and Iraqis live safe lives...

after they've been fed for decades, all done by the U.S.

After they've been fed for decades by the US? What?

Or the dozens, if not hundreds, of other countries and regions that are kept from starvation and/or slaughter by U.S.

What regions are being kept by starvation by the US? Much of the world is starving, and much of the world is being slaughtered, where's the US helping them? Who have we kept from being slaughtered and killed? Who's eating because of the US?

will alone, because of their own people, invasions, or natural disasters. This includes Mexico.

How has America helped Mexico? All America does is **** over Mexico.

-------------------------------------------------------

No, you haven't. You said you've 'read articles'. You said you've got proof. Yet I've seen none of it.

I listed the articles. Articles from well-respected news sources don't count as sources?

No, I have no concrete proof

Then this discussion is over. Sorry, no proof, no claims being true, no nothing. How do I know you're not making up the rest of the stuff you say then? Seriously, if there is no proof to back up your claims, then they are just stupid claims.