if I see someone in a situation I once found myself in that was highly uncomfortable, I find it my moral duty to do my best to put them at ease. I like to think of myself as a good teacher because of this.
Case in point: Someone starts a new project at work they have no idea what they're doing. This project was hardly explained to me when I had to do it myself, so I had to ask a lot of questions and receieve a lot of "you don't know wtf you're doing" looks. I always offer to lend a hand to this person. I give them clear concise instructions and details to make life easier for them, where as when I went through it I had to just guess and make mistakes. I personally thrive on knowledge, and I'm always willing to pass the knowledge I've obtained on.
I believe in SOME cases it's alright to have no sympathy because you had no sympathy, but I can't think of any at this time. It also depends on who the person is on wether or not they require sympathy. If someone's put into a shitty situation where they could use a helping hand or sympathy, but they've just been an absolutely horrible person to me, then.... no, I will not go out of my way to make their life easier. Otherwise, I usually do, or I just avoid that person like the plague, in the case of a timid driver or such, I'll give them plenty of room and get away from them in the process.
I hate bad drivers with a passion though.
Edit: I think that method of thinking should be reversed. If you had a horrible time in drivers ed, shouldn't you think it fair that you try and save other people from having to experience that, rather than forcing someone to also experience it?
Morality is dead.
Bookmarks