I'm sure throughout the course of this discussion I'll find a way to piss at least one person off, so apologies in advance. Now that that's out of the way...
To be perfectly blunt, all the racial diversity, multicultuaralism, and all this other bullcrap tolerance nazis try to shove down the worlds throat makes me sick. They aren't supporting equality in any way shape or form. What these people support is special priveleges given to people because of their race, age, sexual orientation, whatever their group may be. Which is funny, because this is the exact thing minorities were AGAINST when they actually had a right to be pissed off at white people, because white people were giving these things to themselves. But now it's cool to give special priveleges to other people for no better reason than their race? Irony fail much? Turning the problem around does not fix it. I am honestly appalled by the staggering number of people who don't realize this.
Why is there Multicultirism and how does it benefit a country?
Yeah, there are some undeniable advantages, foods and such from other cultures that don't exist where we are and things of that nature... but really, do things like stack up against the disadvantages? Why do we never talk about the disadvantages by the way? They're there I assure you. Many wars in history have been caused by two cultures meeting one another and not agreeing with each others beliefs. Think where society might be if we'd never had to waste men's lives on wars, or thinkers' lives inventing weapons or coming up with battle plans. People would've been free to spend their lives doing more meaningful things, and thinking more meanigful thoughts, possibly leading to more inventions, more advanced technology, more philosophers answering the great questions in life, any number of things, in fact, many of the same things we allegedly have because of multiculturalism.
Some might argue that some people wouldn't have the same technology as other cultures, we wouldn't all have the same ideas, and we wouldn't advance together, but a claim like this actually makes me think of Star trek. Nerdy example, yes, but think about it. Multiple races, humans, Klingons, Romulans, Vulcans, whatever. All from different planets entirely, completely ignorant of each other until they're able to achieve practical space travel and exploration. Not once before this did any of them benefit from interactions with the others, yet they all still achieved mostly equal technology for medicine, communication, and space travel. They all had their own philosophers, their own ideas, their own everything. They got along just fine without each other. In all likelihood, the same would be true of culture isolated on the same planet. They'd advance in their own time, yes. They'd advance differently, but they'd all advance. And they'd all be satisfied with their cultures.
Yes, diversity may well speed up new ideas spreading around the world ... but, on the reverse side, cultures interacting cause conflicts. For every moment we speed up advancement as a species from interaction with another culture, we slow it right back down with some idiotic conflict caused by that same interaction. Is it really an advantage? It's not so clear as one might think without really getting deeper into the subject.
I won't straight up say multiculturalism is bad, or even only on par with total cultural isolation, it may well be that we wouldn't be where we are without other cultures, but I will say I'm skeptical about creditting multiculturalism with as much as people sometimes like to.
Is the white man truly the target of racial accusation?
YES.
Does China complain about the lack of hispanic people in China? No.
Does Spain or Mexico complain about the lack of hispanic people in China? No.
Does the rest of the world complain about the lack of hispanic people in China? No.
Nobody cares about the racial diversity of a Chinese nation, but damn those racist white people for not welcoming illegals with open arms and free money.
Does anybody call it racist to have a hispanic or black scholarship? No.
If I tried to start a scholarship program and specifically stated it was for white people only, would I have every minority and is grandma calling me racist? You'd better blieve I would.
Is it perfectly acceptable to have places that only allow minorites such as muslim only pools? Most of society apparently thinks so.
Was it acceptable to have special buildings for white people only? Apparently not, because damn near every black man in America was protesting against it, and it was made illegal.
Is it cool to have restaraunts that only serve kosher/halaal food with no options there specifically for people who don't choose to eat only those foods? Well of course it is! Kosher/Halaal is a part of somebody's religion! If a nom muslim or jew doesn't like it, they can just eat somewhere else!
Is it then OK for a restaraunt to have a menu that caters to average white people who by and large don't care and like their bacon? Not if a Jew or a Muslim decides they want to eat there.
If I, a white person have beliefs that only allow me to eat pizza, and I walked into a taco bell and complained that their menu wasn't supportive of my beliefs, do you think they'd change their menu for me? Or do you think they'd direct me to the pizza hut next door? I'm guessing the latter. Because the latter makes sense. If a place doesn't serve the food I want to eat, I don't eat there. They don't give a shit if I'm Christian, Muslim, Jewish, Athiest, whathaveyou, it doesn't matter. They're not going to change for me, they shouldn't have to change for anybody else.
And, you know I notice there aren't many Muslims in Iraq demanding bacon stores for non muslims. They seem to be happy with just their culture, but white people can't make the same choice, that's racist. Right. Makes perfect sense.
The REAL racists are minorities who believe they're entitled to special privelges for their race, and anybody who has the nerve to tell them we're not going to live our lives around someone else's beliefs is an evil racist.
Should Australian taxes be put towards religious minorities? When I say this, I refer to the 'muslim only' centers and buildings, etc.
**** no. Places should never be restricted to people of a certain race or religion. Equality is a two way street. If you want to tell me I can't have a "NO MUSLIMS" sign in my window, you'd better be willing to take the "MUSLIMS ONLY" sign out of yours.
The idea of people's money, people of all races and relgions reagrdless of whether or not they're actually able to use these things they're unwillingly pay for is just beyond insane.
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks