This is fun. The people that know me here know I'm not sexist, but maybe I can use sarcastic sexist comments to get a point across.
You're getting confused between ""has a female president" and "had a female president until recently". The latter is what was posted, and is true --
until recently, the Philippines had a female president.
What about animals that only eat other animals? Would it be okay if we only ate animals that only ate other animals? Because, you know, they're mean, and we shouldn't let that happen! Right?
Alright, thanks. I'm gonna go get a polar bear burger, you want one?
Because they're not human. Hence, they're not worth it. It would be impossible to live if we afforded every living thing the respect that we give to humans -- we would be able to kill nothing to get food (including plants, by the way -- they're alive, too), we would have no shelter, we'd have nothing.
Hahahahahah, that's a lovely google search, there. Here's a better answer to that question, though: They all had power. Even if you look at serial killers, it's easier for a man to physically overpower a woman than the other way around, and it would be ignorant to believe that women would not commit more violence against men if they were the physically stronger sex.
Though your inclusion of George W. Bush on that list just
screams ignorance.
Men are also responsible for liberation from the world's most oppressive regimes, and for the infrastructure that fails in those disasters. The computer or phone that you're reading this from, the network that provides its coverage, the electricity that gives it power, the shipping systems and roads that brought it to you in the first place ...
Looks like women are responsible for a very small minority of scientific breakthroughs, so with that type of "thinking", you could also conclude that all women are stupid.
That's prettymuch it. Except that you're allowed to be stupid and sexist, if you choose. Nobody is threatening to kill you for being a sexist twit, whereas you have threatened to kill people for harming animals.
His point was that some women are evil, too, which should be obvious to anybody with a brain.
Honestly, have you ever read
A Child Called "It"? It's a good book on a horrible issue, and it will amaze you just how evil somebody can be.
And since males have nearly always been in power of everything, that proves that females are weak and puny, not worthy of being in charge.
And men are all victims of females and their periods
every month. You want a war zone, YOU try putting up with you.
If you're going to make comments about spelling, it might be a good idea to check your own spelling, and better yet, your grammar. It's not like anybody here iz typn lyk dis.
(That's a joke in itself, isn't it
Order?
You're hard to take seriously?)
Really? So what is the definition of evolution -- "only the ones that don't hurt anything else survive"?
Hahahahahahahah, wow. If you eat animals, you're a Nazi!
So that doesn't apply to you? You think McDonald's is just as bad for serving "beef" or "chicken" as they would be if they served human meat?
I don't know what's more sad -- that you think cows and chickens are just as important as humans, or that you care so little for anything that there could be fast food restaurants serving human meat from a systematic slaughter and
the most you can do is bitch anonymously on an internet video game forum.
And every other normal person in the world.
As has been pointed out, there was a female in charge of one of those two places for ten years, until last year. So why didn't she stop the child labor and animal cruelty? She must be a man in disguise!
Granted, I'm still not sure if you're honestly this ignorant or if you're just good at pretending to be stupid.
Bookmarks