Alpha: While Jin's points that you singled out may not carry weight due to a lack of evidence, I am not sure that your rebuttal really strikes at the heart of the issue. The last paragraph, anyway. What is your stance exactly? I had a rant typed up but I don't really want to start preaching to someone who shares a similar opinion.
I more or less agree with Jin. Particularly about this being more of a censure of thought/free speech/etc. rather than serving to deter any sort of crime. I don't think it's necessary to prove that doing x will cause y, which I doubt they have either. Given that, I'd rather they didn't simply default on banning something "just to be safe."
Originally Posted by Andromeda
Bookmarks