What tradition are we talking about here? Putting Final Fantasy XI on the 360 2-3 years after its release on the PC and PS2 and just months away before the U.S. release of Final Fantasy XII.
Is this tradition of putting the online Final Fantasys on the 360 or just the latest FF? If it is the former then 1 game does not constitute a tradition nor does 2 (FFXIII). Last I heard there were disagreement between SE and Microsoft but SE hasn't ruled out bringing Final Fantasy XIV to the 360.
What does being born in 1994 have anything to do with not owning all the FFs. I started playing in 2002 and have beaten all main entries (excluding FFXI).
I just noticed something: use some punctuation.
If it were released on the 360 later on I think the sales would be there to justify its release, though FFXIII sold less on the 360 and the added fact that FFXIV is online which translates into lower sales of the game. That is, if the game doesn't become a big hit - a lesser WoW. It should be noted that with even a half of FFXIII's sales on the 360 - around 500,00 - the profits would still be wonderful with the monthly payment. The question would be if 360 owners would want to play Final Fantasy XIV and if Microsoft and SE could settle their disuptes.
I would say remember, but you were born in '94; Final Fantasy were originally released on a Nintendo console but switched to the Playstation for FFVII. If not putting Final Fantasy XIV on the 360 is a douche move then how does Nintendo feel about not having a main entry since FFVI - the rage of a thousand gods? Nah, Nintendo is doing just fine with Dragon Quest by their side (RPG related).
Bookmarks