A more accurate description would be saying you invented new chess, instead of red and black, the board is green and blue with chess pieces!!! But I've always been really cynical with first person shooters, there are some good ones that actually TRY to be innovative...then you get Halo 4
I'm one of the few people that thought the idea behind the wii was pretty cool...though when i hold the controllers, i look like michael j fox...so i'm not exactly good at wii games. As for mario...meh, burnt out on it, though one of the zelda games would be interesting...though i don't see much innovation after twilight princessThere's nothing wrong with perfecting a formula, granted you bring something new on the table (I feel a lot of sequels do more than that), I'm pretty sure that's how things work in general. I'm with you on Zelda, Super Mario Galaxy 2 however just might surprise you, give it a go.
I'm just very paranoid >_>I'm pretty sure you're winding me up by this point.
1. I remember this...and it's no surprised they bankrupted their studio...75 million goddamn dollars
2. Why in the hell did a state feel it was appropriate to loan money to a gaming studio...especially the smallest state in the country
Nah, I didn't play many games as a kid, pretty much just mario and pokemon, I've only recently began playing a lot of older games.My two cents: It's all relative. The games you played when you were younger were great because you were less cynical and you had less choice. It's nostalgia and that, my friend, is opium for old people. You were just enjoying the games you played more back then, it doesn't make them better. Games in my opinion will always be the same.
No, cheats are awesome, and they're one thing that's improving, especially with hacking. It's just epic to twist games to where they never should have been. Hell, hacks of games are actually creating pretty amazing games in their own right, google pokemon brown, that game is epic.
Bookmarks