Well, to be honest Wikipedia has fairly accurate information regarding video games and their articles are strung with citations or sometimes "Citation Needed"; wikipedia isn't all that bad. Now, on to the matter at hand: Ashelia used Wiki as her source so I decided to counter with Wiki myself.
You will see, if you read, that I did mention that the article did say that it had elements from many genres one of them being role-playing. The amount of role-playing though is very minimal. If your read/comprehended what I wrote right afterwards that the only game listed as being part RPG is Zelda II which is called an Action-Role Playing. All the other Zelda games have Action-Adventure as their "genre(s)". Therefore it would only be appropriate to call Zelda II an RPG but not any of the other games or the series as a whole.
Yeah, so Shadow of the Colosus has a good claim to being called an RPG too? Because, ya know, you stab lizards, eat their tales, gain some "endurance"; then, ya shoot fruit down with ya arrows and gain some health. Oh, don't forget that each time you defeat a boss your endurance & health paramters increase. Yeaaaaaah, no. Sorry. It has some elements of a RPG, but Shadow of the Colossus and Zelda (except for one game) aren't RPGs - they're action-adventure.
P.S. Wikipedia also has Action-Adventure for the "genre(s)" for Shadow of the Colossus. Gamespot has Shadow of the Colossus and most of the Zelda series as "Fantasy Action-Adventure".
Bookmarks