In terms of Final Fantasy I can agree with this, as other series by Square are normal. A staple of Final Fantasy was that each game was not connected and there were no sequels/prequels. Series like Mana, SaGa (which I want a new game from), Front Mission, etc do follow a continium. I would prefer that square work on new I.P (TWEWY) or on very high, Triple-A quality games. Another bad thing about adding new material is that it creates contradictions and inconcistencies in the game's universe, because I doubt that the developers do a very intense research of the game to make sure there are no problems with the flow of the story. Add the fact that sequels/prequels have a very hard time achieving the same level of love as the original and it comes down to
This may not be as easy today with the cost in developing games with today's technology, but it would be nice if it was the focus. It seems like they're given newcomers to the industry a chance to have their shot, but not with the full force that Square is capable of "gallomphing".
I also think that with the sequels/prequels and newer games outside of FF and DQ main series, the stories are getting weaker and weaker and they are dying off at least outside of Japan (Mana and SaGa). Of course a game that has a great reputation Front Mission 5, that really brought the series back up, is not released outside of Japan for foreign fans to enjoy.
With Final Fantasy X and Final Fantasy XII, I agree with Pete, both ended well. The ending of Final Fantasy VII was not that deep but that too was ok. At times I don't like FF X-2 because of what it did, though my dislike should go to the ones who "OK'ed" the game; it had good parts too it but it broke a special part of the series.
That's it for now.
Bookmarks