No. Not at all. I'm socially awkward, morally dead, moderately saddistic, in poor physical condition, and have more halth problems han I could name given the vBulletin post character limit. One does not need to be perfect to be correct. Simiarly, one doesn't have to be flawed to be wrong. This is why we use critical thinking to evaluate arguments for what they say rather than resorting to name calling like you have once again when you've run out of points to make.

Once more, you have stated it, but completely and utterly failed to prove it. When you can succesfully use lgoci to establish a point, I will acknowledge its validity, evaluate your premises, and come to a conclusion on whether or not your argument is compelling enough to reverse my judgement. As of now, your arguments aren't even valid, so arguing about whether they're sound isn't even a possibility. And you might try reading your own posts some time, you're guilty of everything you've accused me of thus far (without reason) and have once again resoted to taking the argument to a personal level because you can't establish a point with your current information. There's a reason you keep getting warnings bro, you do this every time you're wrong (or at least incapable of proving otherwise).