Quote Originally Posted by Jin View Post
And yet you don't seem to. Not even an explanation as to what you're talking about. I'll probably lose some philosophy cred for this, but we don't all know Aquinas' or Aristotle's theories, certainly not in their entirety. Could you perhaps elaborate on them? I'm not usually one to advocate having to explain simple things in threads, but this is hardly simple.
Yeah sorry about this i was going to look at what people generally had to say then describe it some more but i was London the past 2 days so i missed your posts.

As of yet i have only read up to your posts about time and here would be my view on that time is not Infinite and my best piece of evidence for this would be That David Hume had said Aquinas had made a fallacy of composition which translates too just because we see the sun rise and set everyday doesent mean it will tomorrow we assume it will because of our own experiences we can apply this to time in that we have experience of time just being there always but none of us experienced the beginning of the universe so we cant apply this to today.

The Big bang is seen as the cause of the universe if that is true then thats when time began so we have to assume that when the universe ends so will time. I left out the basic principle that whatever has a beginning must have an end, sorry.