It could result in the murder of hundreds of otherwise healthy human beings. The child could get adopted to a serial killer. That would cause repressed trauma at a young age, and the child would then grow up to be a serial killer. So by promoting the illegilization of abortion, you're supporting serial killings. You have fantastic moral values, man.Originally Posted by Sasquatch
It's not actually a child. It's an embryo, which is a stage far before childhood. It's the stage between the zygote and the fetus, so technically, that's too early in development to be considered a child. I could see declaring an eight or nine month year old fetus a child, but that's only because it's about ready to be born.
I'm pretty sure you don't understand any of this, considering that you're a man (and a pretty sexist one at that.) Pregnancy changes a woman's body. It stretches the skin and makes the next nine months incredibly uncomfortable. You really need to stop arguing about things that you have no right arguing about. It's not the man's right to say what the woman can and cannot do. It's the individual's right to do what she or he thinks is necessary. If an abortion is that option, then what's the big ****ing deal?
Other animals don't pollute the world to change the environment. Humans burn fossil fuels using all their bullshit machinery to build, because they're too lazy to get off their fat asses and do the work themselves. Just like how humans are too lazy to walk nowadays. Everybody has a car, which makes for greater pollution to infect my lungs. When are those damn car manufactures going out of business?
You obviously know nothing about the law. Making something illegal when it's already been tried before is entirely illegal. That's called double jeopardy, and it infringes against the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Abortion was first ruled after Roe v. Wade in 1973, which made abortion legal. That particular subject can't be tried again. It's a done deal. Let me give you an example. When OJ Simpson was found innocent for the charges of murder via premeditated malice, after the verdict was read, he could have stood up, right in the court room, in front of the judge and the jury, and admitted to killing his wife, and they wouldn't be able to do shit about it, because they had already declared him an innocent man. There are no exceptions to double jeopardy. In order to bring OJ back to court, they would have had to catch him on another charge (which they did, actually.)
There is an overpopulation of little girls in Chinese adoption centers, and the majority of them never even get adopted. If nobody had abortions, all adoption agencies would be as bad as the ones in China. Also, if nobody got an abortion, that would mean that the majority of people in a relationship would have a child, seemingly eliminating the need for adoption, so the orphans left in adoption homes would stay there until they're old enough to be on their own. And where do you think people are going to go that don't have a proper upbringing? The males get addicted to drugs, and the women go to the red light district.
Every one person on earth could kill and eat two other people. Then there wouldn't be an overpopulation, and there would be no food shortage. That sounds a lot better than having legalized abortion.
Bookmarks