Jesus never existed.

[Jin]

The fact that there is nothing that even alludes to Jesus's existance doesn't exactly prove that he doesn't exist. At the same time it is evidence that he may have not existed.

How do I say this inoffensively? If I had to choose to believe you that there is nothing that even alludes Jesus' existence or the larger historical community that says he does...well, sorry, but you can't win unless you've got some interesting new proof that everyone else seemed to miss.

Many Historians agree that Jesus exists? I think you meant to say that historians agree that he existed. Either way what does this matter? I am pretty sure you could use the same argument for the other side. There are quite a few historians that do not believe that Hayzeus ever existed.

Was this rehearsed? Are you a multiple account? I can't believe that two seperate people would have the exact same debating strategy to pick out the smallest typo in a debate and use it as content for their argument.

I'm afraid that argument does not work for the otherside as Jesus not existing is not a generally accepted fact and any historian that denies his existence needs a pretty good deal of proof to counter all the evidence that has been collected supporting his existence.