Moon landing conspiracy theories. I want to know what you think. I watched This in a biology class a long time ago ( like sophomore year) and after I felt bamboozled, then I saw it again a few days ago, and I realized that some of their arguments sound ridiculous.
For example the waving flag. I was curious about this, so I looked up images, and the flag has a rod towards the top that keeps the flag horizontally firm (Like a penis hahaokay I'm done.) It's also slightly scrunched looking , so it's similar to what the house curtains do along the rod. That's why there's a "wave".
Other than that though, I'm not a science wiz so idk about all the other shit.
BUT, I doooo however, know a little about light sources since that's pretty much all I worked with last art class. Imo, the "the fake image" thing is stupid because I'm sure that one, the contrast of the images were all farked up to begin with. "here let me just set my camera to moon setting." -_- It's like they're suggesting that NASA decided to put in cross hairs and some how messed up. Why would they go through the trouble of adding them in to begin with?
And for the non parallel shadows from a single light source, I think it's a case of perspective 101. 3D space on 2D image. That's why they don't look parallel. It depends on where the image was taken. If there was more than one light source there would need to be more than one shadow per object. There's only one shadow per each object.
But anyway, I don't really have a solid opinion because I don't care about an erect flag on the moon, but I DO care enough to hear your opinions![]()








okay I'm done.) It's also slightly scrunched looking , so it's similar to what the house curtains do along the rod. That's why there's a "wave".


Reply With Quote
Bookmarks