I personally don't think they should be banning the stuff that doesn't actually involve real people. If you give pedophiles an outlet they can express themselves in without children being harmed, won't that possibly mean more are preoccupied from potentially becoming child molestors?

If they have no outlets, I'd think that might actually drive some to molest a real child or pursue real life child pornography which in turn would increase demand and possibly also the profitability for non-pedophiles to make videos of children being molested and the like to spread to pedophiles for monetary gain. My reasoning? Supply and Demand. If everyone wants a Subaru Impreza they suddenly get stolen more and sold for higher amounts than they would have previously. People pay for what they want...

To damn a pedophile who has not molested a child or does not plan to is wrong in my way of thinking, but to deny them of outlets where they can get it out of their system in a way not including a real child is just as wrong.

Solely my thoughts on the matter, I'm doubting I can be convinced otherwise without damn good reasoning. If enough pedophiles want a GTA: The Secret Underground Bunker, make it for them. They'd spend their time playing the game rather than being anywhere near real kids.