Do I speak Chinese? I made it clear that I think we should have won. I also made it clear that I would have accepted a proper verdict. And I clearly stated that I would have EVEN accepted defeat on the basis of this excuse for a verdict IF I would remotely think that we were inferior. But that's not the case. Is that understandable?

No leader would accept this crap.

And I will not even start to comment on your polemics. Let me instead quote someone else. I'll censor some parts.
Quote Originally Posted by one participant
Anomaly is a ***.

First Toph says The Masters won. Then Toph says noone won. Then Toph says that his original verdict is crap and based on mininterpretations, but that he will stick to it anyway. Yet the *** still claims to have won honourably and commends Toph sticking to his guns no matter how shitty they may be.
Everything is said and done. I demand a proper verdict.