Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: ATI vs nVidia

  1. #1
    Like a Boss Sean's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Saint Louis, Missouri
    Age
    38
    Posts
    5,616

    ATI vs nVidia

    I've always been an nVidia buyer, for a long, long time. The only ATI I've ever had came off an old Dell in 2004 with a 4GHz Intel P4 and an ATI x300.

    I've been building my own systems for years now, and I've been leaning towards switching to ATI, because I'm an AMD supporter and AMD now owns ATI, and AMD North/Southbridges are more common than nVidia North/Southbridges on AM2/3 motherboards these days.

    Two questions I really have but haven't found solid answers to are...

    How do I compare ATI model numbers to nVidia models? Tomshardware used to have great guides for this, but the site's become a nightmare to navigate as of late.

    Do AMD North/Southbridges play well with nVidia cards in the PCI X16 slots? I'm FAIRLY sure it doesn't matter too much, but I know the south(?)bridge is a big player in video rendering.

    Is it worth swapping off of nVidia, which I've always known to have better driver support, just because I'm running AMD chips on AM2/3 boards with AMD bridges?
    Last edited by Sean; 07-07-2009 at 08:55 PM.

  2. #2
    Warlord of Your Mom ATI vs nVidia ultima_trev's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Kingdom of Dis
    Age
    40
    Posts
    2,990
    The battle always shifts. After G80 based GF 8800 GTX, nVidia rode the wave of success for two years before finally ATI produced a worthy competitor in the form of the Radeon HD 4000 series.

    And now ATI pwns the shit out of nVidia with the HD 5800 series, which is priced lower than the GF 285, produces better frames, and supports Direct X 11.

    Although that new Fermi architecture does appear to be a beast, it seems mostly designed for HPC apps and not games, meaning ATI might get to be the gaming card leader for some time to come, like nVidia was with G80.

    People also seem to like ATI's Catalyst drivers better than nvidia's Forceware.

    Anyhow, I like the underdog better. nVidia and Intel can suck it, AMD-ATI FTFW.

    As for comparable model numbers:

    GeForce 8800 / 9800 series = Radeon HD 2900 / Radeon HD 3800 series
    GeForce GTS 250 = Radeon HD 4850
    GeForce GTX 260 = Radeon HD 4870
    GeForce GTX 275 = Radeon HD 4890
    GeForce GTX 285 = Radeon HD 5850
    GeForce GTX 295 (dual gpu card) = Radeon HD 5970 (also dual gpu card)

    As for running nVidia cards on AM2/3 mainboards, it should be just fine as long as you got enough juice in the PSU and you got PCIE 2.0.

    For good tech resource sites, I recommend AnandTech.com, HardOCP.com, or TechReport.com, all at least as good as Tom's Hardware.
    Last edited by ultima_trev; 12-06-2009 at 03:13 AM.


    Undisputed masters of all creation since 2004.11.11.

  3. #3
    Permanently Banned loaf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Austin
    Age
    35
    Posts
    4,105
    I've had both ATI and Nvidia cards.

    ATI's CCC is buggy and crashes all the time.

    NVIDIA's control panel is great.

    I'd rather have NVIDIA, I've had better experience with Nvidia then ATI, but I think ATI's cards run better.
    Signature Updated: Yesterday
    CPC8! - Pimpin' is easy

    CPC8! - Chess Club

    SPOILER!!:
    lol


    Currently Playing: Video Games

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-30-2008, 06:47 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •