Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dr. Egon Spengler
There is no family, but loved ones is a term used to describe anybody who somebody loves, whom just so happens to love them back, which would also include friends. Just because somebody was abandoned by his or her family doesn't mean that that person doesn't have at least one friend.
Doesn't mean they do, either.
Quote:
An intervention makes it easy for people to seek help.
The point you continually fail to grasp is not only that it is still difficult for people with depression to seek help, but that people with causes for depression are much less likely to have the people that care about them to hold said intervention.
You keep claiming that depressed people don't think clearly -- how will an intervention help, if that's the case?
Quote:
It's not a lack of a cause. As I just said, the underlying problem is the cause for depression, not the feelings of worthlessness.
The underlying problem could be feelings of worthlessness. If it's not, it causes the feelings of worthlessness, which then lead to depression. You're still not understanding the difference between causes and effects.
Quote:
Only from the mouth of an American. Americans say that AIDS developed in Africa, as a result of ****ing monkeys.
Nobody mentioned screwing monkeys, kid. Keep your fantasies to yourself.
Quote:
Africans, however, say that AIDS developed in America.
Some African tribes also believe that dancing causes rain and good hunts, other tribes are subhuman and barely worthy to be slaves, and that the only cure for AIDS is sex with a virgin.
Quote:
Where it came from, exactly, is still a mystery. It's ridiculous to say that it developed in Africa, because as far as we know, it could have just as well developed in America.
... no, not as far as we know. as far as the civilized, technologically and medically advanced world knows, HIV came from Africa. Period. End of discussion. But if you need some evidence ...
One. Two. Three. Four. Five. Six.
I'd imagine it's too much to ask for credible evidence to back up your asinine claims, ain't it?
Quote:
Considering that your common knowledge about AIDS is wrong, I would also like to add that firsthand experience doesn't give immediate background information on the brain during the processes of depression.
Wrong twice. Not only does everybody with an IQ above room-temperature know that AIDS developed in Africa, but they also know that firsthand experience does give one a greater understanding than is had by those who have never had such experience.
I never said that having depression gives "immediate background information on the brain". Please, at least attempt to argue against the points I make, instead of making things up that you think you can argue against.
Quote:
Actually, no they don't. For example, most people go to some type of psychologist to find out what's going on inside of their mind when they realize that they have a major screw loose.
To get help and learn more about it. If they didn't know a damn thing about it, they wouldn't know they "have a major screw loose".
Quote:
If that psychologist has never been depressed, but has studied cognitive behavior and can pinpoint major depressive disorder as the leading cause of problems, then how the hell does he know that, I wonder. Hmm... That's a mystery.
Bcause the psychologist has had more than two entry-level college courses, that's how. Besides, many people enter a field because of personal reasons -- like, say, being close to somebody with a psychological condition, or having one themselves.
Quote:
Just playing the game like you would, my good friend.
First, I'm not your friend, kid. Second, I'm not playing a game -- though I do find your back-peddling and contradicting amusing. And third, the burden of proof concerning your claims is on you. It's your job to back them up, not my job to show you how wrong you are.
Quote:
Going by your own words, not many people with problems ever get professional help, so therefore, by saying such a thing, you're strengthening my argument. Thank you, good sir.
Read it again -- I said "if". If they get help, they learn more about it. I wouldn't strengthen your argument if you actually knew what I said. Try again.
Quote:
Yes, common sense is wrong.
Coming from you ... that really doesn't surprise me.
Quote:
I never said that they were crazy, Hal. I said that they think with negative cognitive patters, which changes perspectives on things. But even so, the logical and reasonable parts of the brain should still work, even if they are a bit distorted. So, it's a conscious decision because the person is aware of what he or she is doing.
They're just not thinking clearly, according to you. How can you claim that something is a conscious decision if they aren't thinking clearly? There are defenses for murders that consist of that very argument.
Quote:
More so with families who experience a suicide.
Says you. Forgive me if, based on your past claims that have consisted of pure bullshit, we don't believe you.
Quote:
Well, in order to be diagnosed with clinical depression, one has to be depressed nearly every day for two consecutive weeks, so to answer your question, yes, in order to be clinically depressed, the client always has to be depressed. Otherwise, it's not depression.
Let's see some evidence -- credible evidence, from somebody other than yourself -- that one has to be depressed all day, every day for fourteen days to be diagnosed with depression.
Quote:
What's realistic is telling the truth.
What's realistic is a person who has been through even one or two college psychology courses to know what the hell they're talking about. You don't exactly project realism -- so hey, if you're going to make claims that you know more about psychology than others here because you've been through a few lectures, you might as well just keep piling it on and claim you passed them with flying colors.
Quote:
Well you did, so get over it, you big freakin' baby.
... but you didn't. Which was your argument. Are you going to claim that you just missed it, or are you going to admit that you tried to bullshit your way out of it?
Quote:
No, you just like green.
And according to that argument and your first or second post here, those who attempt suicide just like the attention.
Quote:
No, unconsciously. Exactly what I said. The unconscious mind has nothing to do with sleep. That would be more "non-conscious" than unconscious.
You obviously know nothing of psychology, because you just failed to acknowledge the teachings of Sigmund Freud.
Freud was a nut. You can want to to bone your mother all you want, but that ain't for me.
By the way -- the concept of the unconscious mind wasn't developed by Freud, it was developed by Schelling, who was an incompetent schmuck who mostly wrote jumpy and illogical nonsense.
Thanks for proudly displaying your "knowledge" of psychology, kid. Great job.
Quote:
No, there's no research that needs to be done on burden of proof.
There is by you -- well, nevermind, that's an assumption. I can only assume that you are truly ignorant of the burden of proof, instead of knowing about it and simply ignoring it. Then again, if I had such asinine claims as yours, I wouldn't be able to back them up, either.
Quote:
I always wanted to have a manic period. It sounds like fun, as long as there's no depressive period. Perhaps there's some way to biologically cause me to have a temporary unipolar manic disorder.
It's not like you just get a lot of energy for a while, kid. I would tell you to learn a bit about psychological disorders before you make stupid comments, but it's way too late for that.
Quote:
I never said that I haven't gone through it, which, most people probably already assumed that I haven't. I could have, and then again, I might not have.
And I never said that I haven't gone through half a dozen psych courses, but you make ignorant assumptions anyway. Besides, I'm sure we know whether or not you have any experience whatsoever with psychological disorders ... at least deperssion, anyway.
Quote:
Either way, it doesn't matter, because I'm just judging the disorder from a personal viewpoint.
Judging the disorder from a personal viewpoint with no personal experience? Sounds like that's not a smart thing to do.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Silver
My point is, a lot of doctors and science-y people rely too much on whichever result has popped up the most when doing their diagnosis of a new patient and though that approach may nail the problem a good percentage of the time, they can really **** up. Psychology in general seems to me to be far from being very reliable, especially when I look at some of the forefathers of the field who were often the kinds to spit out a lot of crap with the supposed gems.
Exactly. On some occasions, anybody who said something that a lot of people disagreed with is now considered a "psychologist". But you're right on psychological problems being diagnosed too frequently, I believe. Especially in the cases of ADD/ADHD and such. Not saying they don't exist, but all too often it has become a parenting tool. Can't control your kids? Dope 'em up!
Quote:
... I do find it amusing that someone who has in the past argued against my arguments that firsthand experiences of something are valid is now using that same train of thought. But I definetely see it as a good thing. :D
I usually argue against your use of anecdotal evidence, instead of personal experience. Still, if arguments based on your personal experience could be backed up by the majority of those who have shared the same experience, I'd be all for it.