Anyways let me start off by saying thanks Silver, you counter some things with statements that I agree with (like the "when" issue). It's always nice to know there is another sane person out there on the subject...
OMG YOU have to get off the reasoning that you "think" that Canada's Health care is atrocious. Yes, It's not perfect, YES, It can be thought that it is bad by certain people and you have found articles they have written (round of applause) but the real "fact" is that it keeps being voted for (by voteing for the party) for a very long time. IF it was as awful as you keep stating it would probably be more of an issue for them and they would progressively have less and less until it was no more but it has been going strong as long as I've known. If you think that just because people live a few degrees north that makes a whole country stupid enough to keep it around when it's apparently soooo bad then that would be an ignorant assumption. Anyways the real subject of the thread isn't "The US should have a free healthcare plan JUST like Canada does"Quote:
Every system in place now was started when somebody said, "You know what, this would be a good idea." Socialized medicine is one of those things that wouldn't be a good idea -- and the U.S. only has to look North or at their British allies to see how bad of an idea it is.
Anyways While we're back on assuming, I donno why the stereotyping had to be brought back up. I did (some of) it, I myself realized it, and I disciplined myself because of it. Then I had an opinion on a single person based on what I was presented with. Just in case anyone is still boo hooing over it: On my behalf I'm sorry, it was wrong.
This blew my mind. On several occasions you have insisted that anyone even the poor could afford private healthcare with simple payments and bullshit and now that I really think of it THATS bullshit. Against anyone who said that they wouldn't be able to afford such and such you have said that they COULD IF they had an efficiently budgeted and responsible health plan... Thats ridiculous to think that any low budget health insurance would make any money problems go away on ANY misfortune or incident. Like if Pablo Honey was in america her mother would get treated and there would be no financial problems afterwards because they could pay the minimum payment on the plan they choose with the precognitive knowledge that she would fall into those saddening events. Also thinking that a plan where you have to pay so little each month or whatever wouldn't be an incredible nuisance where things such as interest would prevent someone from paying an annoying bill off for even longer. In most places that have universal/free health care (even the dreaded Canada) the health care system does cover everything that needs treatment (even though I know you'll play this out like people sit outside hospitals with vultures picking at them because they had to wait sooo long) with minimum payments(in tax). In places that have privatized healthcare if you can and do choose to have a cheaper healthcare plan (like one of the ones you have insisted that anybody that works could afford) they would not cover nearly as much as a government run healthcare plan would. You pay for insurance against diseases, you break a bone "sorry you arn't covered" etc etc. With a universal health care plan these things definatly don't come up so often (I'm not gonna say never because you'll for sure come up with 16 articles of isolated and extreme events where it did happen)Quote:
That would indicate that 92% of the people are either satisfied enough with public health care or unsatisfied and cannot afford private healthcare.
Also like i have kinda said before just because you have found articles stating that such and such is bad dosn't mean that there arn't articles that say otherwise or even that it is a fact. You have brought up articles that insist that Canadas healthcare is a travesty and such. Just because an article says it dosn't mean its true, even if its by people who should really know... For example wasn't there a time when most of the Bush administration insisted that there were WMDs in Iraq? Then it was found to be untrue. I would expect the highest government officials to be in the know and anybody responsible for stating these claims to know for sure before they do but guess what? They were wrong just as an article can be wrong or just plain subjective. Before anyone gets retarded and says "apples to oranges" again ITS AN EXAMPLE I AM NOT SAYING THEY ARE EXACTLY THE SAME.
Kids are covered by the police and they can't buy their own guns. Orphans will be helped by police and they really don't have anyone to personally protect them. Universal healthcare would also cover people just like them where they couldn't get their own private healthcare. Would you chastise an orphan saying "You should budget correctly and if you did your research you could be paying as little as $5 a month for expensive medical care" because you have lived in a world where healthcare insurance was denied to you right? See extremes can argue a lot of things...Quote:
And let's also not forget that everybody can buy a firearm for their own personal protection, and that many people who can afford it actually do have bodyguards.