"Cyber" Sex

I don't see how anyone doing cybersex is different from someone trying out some unusual sex positions. Both can be done with strangers, so in that respect they're equally 'weird'.

Whether you like to see your partner on a little screen on some occasions, rather than actually feeling the warm body is entirely up to everyone's personal choice.

It can be a solution to couples that are far away for some reason, and feel like it's really the only way to keep things erotic between them too. If that's what you're into.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RagnaToad

Cyber sex: Nothing wrong with that.

Kids being lured into sexual stuff via the internet: Wrong for sure.

---

This. Nothing wrong with cyber sex. Yay cyber sex. Kids getting lured into it is the issue.

This thread is fail. :(

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Che

This thread is fail. :(

---

Haha. I bet it is.

hahaha, this reminds me of the time when there were a few fellow tff members (like Joe, Polk, me and a few others too that I can't remember) went to some chatroom acting as underage girls and punking those old horny men. It was quite fun, I sat in the room under some random name (like goldprincess97 or some shit) and I got so many private chat IMs I literally couldn't answer all of them rofl. But yeah the chat logs I have are both shocking and hilarious all at once, you wouldn't believe some of the stuff they said to me.

Anyways yeah, random cybersex is pretty bad but at least it doesn't have the huge risks that sexual intercourse has (VD/kids/etc.), though it is something I would find too awkward to do. But trying to exploit underage kids into doing it is really ****ed up and a big no-no and I would never wish that on anyone's kids.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rocky

hahaha, this reminds me of the time when there were a few fellow tff members (like Joe, Polk, me and a few others too that I can't remember) went to some chatroom acting as underage girls and punking those old horny men. It was quite fun, I sat in the room under some random name (like goldprincess97 or some shit) and I got so many private chat IMs I literally couldn't answer all of them rofl. But yeah the chat logs I have are both shocking and hilarious all at once, you wouldn't believe some of the stuff they said to me.

Anyways yeah, random cybersex is pretty bad but at least it doesn't have the huge risks that sexual intercourse has (VD/kids/etc.), though it is something I would find too awkward to do. But trying to exploit underage kids into doing it is really ****ed up and a big no-no and I would never wish that on anyone's kids.

---

OMG Rocky. Let'scybernaoplzkthx.

And honestly, I'd rather have my kids cybering and playing around and getting off using a computer than seeking out IRL ****meat. *shrug*

oh haha vv i thought you meant do the dog. and im not sure if i would or souldnt. its too hard of a question. haha jk probablyt wouldnt. if you cant do that stuff to the girls face then oh well

I think Cybersex is wrong to an extent. Yes older men drooling over young teenage girl pictures is wrong. But I have no control over that. I say if they do then let the bastards get caught. Pardon the language. I do admit that I have engaged in cyber sex before. In my younger days. But it was with my current girlfriend and it was controled and not out in the open for EVERYONE to read. Thats just ideotic. The youth of today are getting stupider in my opinion. Plain and simple. Don't RP out having sex with a stranger on the damn computer. You don't have to be a dumbass to know not to do that. I mean come on. They are teaching things in 6th grade now that I learned in the 8th grade. You think they would have something that said. "DON'T ENGAGE IN CYBER SEX WITH A STRANGER" Honestly. They shouldnt even need to say that much. Kids just get to carried away with things and they take it too far sometimes. I'm not aginst cybersex in general and I'm not aginst kids being "lured into it". They are capable of making decisions wether they be right or wrong they will have to live with it. Cyber sex with someone you know and cyber sex with someone you don't know is seperate catagories both with diffirent conseqences.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by xXCloudXx

I'm not aginst kids being "lured into it".

---

'xcuse me?
So what you're practically saying is that perves can ask kids to take their clothes off on the internet all they want.

Quote:

---

They are capable of making decisions wether they be right or wrong they will have to live with it.

---

That is such an awkward thing to say. I guess a 14 year old girl should just live with the fact that she was messing around with someone, and the next day it turned out to be a 60 year old guy, spreading naked pictures of her all over the internet.

So basically anything done to kids is 'their own decision' in some respect.

I mean, a kid should know not to come with a stranger who has candy, so being molested by some perve is his own fault right?

Jeez...

Sorry if you didn't understand what I wrote. No where in what I wrote did I say the it was "Ok for someone to ask ANYONE to take their cloths off on the enternet.

And it was the 14 year old girls decision to to show the person that she DID NOT KNOW naked pictures of herself. So yes if she is that ignorant then why wouldnt she have to live with it. You don't have to be smart to know the diffirence between right and wrong. 5 year olds can make that judgment.

And where the hell did I mention candy???

I just applied the same logic to another situation.

So in your mind, every victim has himself to thank for being molested?

I mean, a little girl shouldn't walk alone on the street where perves walk around, right...

It's her 'decision' to go outside and risk being raped, right...

In my opinion the worst part of cybersex is not knowing EXACTLY how old the person you are talking to is I mean for all you know you could be an adult talking to some 12 year old or something. So I think that it is not right but isn't illegal. which is why I believe that if someone is going to do that then there should be specific websites for that that you have to have a credit card to use because it is usually the adults who can have credit cards where I am at. It is a greater way to ensure that adults are the only ones on the sites and not under age people.

I read somewhere once about a kid forwarding sexting texts from his now ex-girlfriend and a few nude photos of her she sent him to everyone on his address book, including her family.

He got slapped with child porn charges and I think the parents went for harassment. Funny story, none the less.

Anyways, I never saw the appeal of doing it with random people, you never know who's on the other end of that PC. When only text is involved, and screen names are incredibly easy to create, it could be like... that guy from the WoW South Park episode. Lulz.

Quote:

---

RagnaToad: I just applied the same logic to another situation.

So in your mind, every victim has himself to thank for being molested?

I mean, a little girl shouldn't walk alone on the street where perves walk around, right...

It's her 'decision' to go outside and risk being raped, right...

---

Arent you straying form the topic. The discussion was on "Cyber sex". Not girls being Raped or walking on streets. If you want to discuss "these" things post a new thread and I will give you my opinion on the matter. Until then I will discuss my opinion on "Cyber sex". The origonal topic.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by xXCloudXx

Arent you straying form the topic. The discussion was on "Cyber sex". Not girls being Raped or walking on streets. If you want to discuss "these" things post a new thread and I will give you my opinion on the matter. Until then I will discuss my opinion on "Cyber sex". The origonal topic.

---

He's not going off topic at all..... Topics branch into many different things that can still relate to the original post. It happens in almost every thread. ;!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TenseikenSlash

He's not going off topic at all..... Topics branch into many different things that can still relate to the original post. It happens in almost every thread. ;!

---

Actually nowhere in this topic did I read anything asking for your opinion on wether or not you think it is the fault of a teenage girl if she gets raped or if she walkes down a street with perves. Branching off into another form of he discussion on Cyber sex I would understand but that is actually a whole diffirent discussion.

Yes, let's stay on topic and make sure your posts are 900 pages long using big words.

Ever stop and think, hey, by posting that this is off-topic, I'm actually going off topic? If you want to get back to the original topic, try posting something on that. That being said...

I was totally cybering with this chick the other day, and I wasn't sure if it was a real chick or a dude, so I got freaked out and left.

Che isn't that a bit of a contradiction? You just did what you said not to do... oh well.

Finally back to the topic in hand:

Quote:

---

Sexual predators and law enforcement
The relative anonymity of Internet communication may provide encouragement to seek out underage cybersex partners. In the course of such conversations, such individuals sometimes try to send child pornography to others or arrange real-life meetings (see child grooming).
In the United States, police officers sometimes pose as minors in chat rooms in order to bait sex offenders.[8] On one occasion, an elderly man from Georgia flew into Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport in Atlanta to meet what he thought was an underage girl he had met online with whom to have sex, only to meet sheriff's deputies instead. Another time, a teacher from Minnesota was arrested by FBI agents in Yuma, Arizona's airport, after he had arranged online to meet and have sex with what he thought were two eight-year-old girls.[citation needed]
This practice is sometimes somewhat controversial, and in some cases may be considered a form of entrapment, especially if the accused can prove that they were not intentionally 'grooming' their target, that the enforcer was encouraging them to meet, or that the meeting's intention was non-sexual.

---

Here is a quote from Wiki about what RagnaToad and XxCloudxX brought up so...

cloud you are completely failing to see that ragna toad is drawing parralels with what you said to their logical conclusion. What you said was, and I quote

"And it was the 14 year old girls decision to to show the person that she DID NOT KNOW naked pictures of herself. So yes if she is that ignorant then why wouldnt she have to live with it"

You are clearly saying that if a young girl is exploited it's intirely their fault because they're obviously dumb and ignorant. Is it the 14 year olds fault that they were tricked into cybering with a man many years their senior? And in parralel. Is it the womans fault that they were raped because they walked down a notorious walkway? Ragna toad is highlighting the stupidity of your arguement, and failing to pick up the mockerey does not really make you seem that intelligent, well perceptive would be better.

People are not ignorant, young girls are not ignorant. They know that the person on the other side of the screen is a stranger, that he might be a fake. But what catches these girls is arrogence. It could never happen to me. He's so sweet he must be real. We share the same interests. People are far too trusting of the words on the screen, far too desperate for this fantasy boy to be real. Can you blame a girl for following a dream, indulging in a fantasy. And even if you do blame the girl, she's still the victim, or did that little snippet pass straight past you.

EDIT: Huh, that turned out far more venemous than I thought it would

My problem with cyber sex and that kids seem to think it actually counts as a sexual encounter.

On another forum I go to, there was a 14 year old girl bragging about her anal experience with her boyfriend. A few people told her to stop being so disgusting by advertising her underage sex life to the Internet and somehow it arose that it was all done 'cyber' style.
I can see a lot of kids geting in trouble with their parents if they happened to come across one of these types of things, and good riddance. If you want to be really sad, say that little Timmy jiggled your googlelolflaps when it clearly isn't true, go ahead. :P
On the other hand, it's fine if you acknowledge it for what it is.

Cyber sex is fine if that's what you're into, but stop pretending it actually counts as sex. You're just watching/listening to somebody do things to themselves.

I did spend time on this over a few years with various boyfriends but I have absolutely no interest in it anymore because as I said before; it isn't real. And I'd rather have the real thing. I don't think I've done anything like that since I was 16 or 17. Go figure.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by xXCloudXx

And where the hell did I mention candy???

---

Sorry, but that made me lol.

This is why it's so hard to carry on a decent conversation with random people on a forum. :p