....You have no idea what you're talking about. Sure, while a majority of things are geared towards teens, doesn't mean that "only teens are allowed to play these games/watch these movies/read these books" etc. It just means they're the target audience. Not the ONLY audience. >_>;
Hell, basically everything is geared towards teens now days (even advertising).
The internet is actually more for 18+ people. Hence why porn is all over the place. You think that's just for teenagers? You keep showing that you're just a "know-it-all" punk who has no respect for anybody but yourself. There is no specific rule or law that states that the internet is just for teenagers. If there is, again, please show me some hard evidence rather than spouting off BS. Give me an article. Give me a website. Show me something.
Same goes for games.
The Internet = for teenagers
...Right. See? This is why we can't get along. Sorry, I'm only 25, and guess what? 80% of the people on this forum are older than 18. Besides, what's wrong with older people playing video games? Who made the rule that only young people can? And no, I'm not a pedophile. ...And I don't talk to random people anyhow. Also, I hate candy. ---------------------------------------- You asked me why we can't get along, and you keep proving why we can't.
You are an old man/woman who is on the Internet. And on that Internet, your on a GAMING forum. Which makes it twice as creepy. Your like a pedophile, if you walked into my high school and started talking to random people like you do on here, then I (and everyone else) would consider you a pedophile. "Hey there little boy, you want some candy?" -you in my high school
...Who was the one that resorted to name calling first, again? Oh right, you. That's why we can't get along. You're too young and immature and don't know how to argue. For one, you never proved me wrong. Don't say you did, because you know for a fact that you didn't. And if you actually think you did, then I'm sorry for you, because you actually didn't. You didn't provide hard evidence. No articles, no links, no resources that supported your stance. You can't just say random crap and think you proved someone wrong. Also, a good way to not get along with someone is to, you guessed it, resort to name calling and taunt them in your signature. ^_^ Not to mention that interview snippet wasn't written by me. It was an excerpt of the gamespot.com article that I linked to you, if you ever bothered to click it. So no, I didn't say that I was my own news source. I have no idea how you gathered that.
Why can't we just get along?
Actually you can keep it for all I care, but I'm just saying. If you keep it there, you'll get warned for flaming.
"If you don't want to be warned any further, I suggest you remove it." You most respectfully request?
May want to take that last bit in your sig out. It's pretty much against our forum rules. If you don't want to be warned any further, I suggest you remove it. Not to mention I never actually trolled you, by the definition of trolling. I guess that's besides the point. Anyway, I apologize for taking the argument too far (Although for the record, all you did was call me names.), so anyway. Sorry about all that.
....And where was that, exactly? I don't recall saying those exact words in my previous VM. All I did was link you to an article. I just said "Oh hey, proof." And linked you to a gamespot interview. Granted it's 2 years old, but it still has some merit.
Wow, ego much? You just called yourself a reliable news source.
AGDC '07: Blizzard president Mike Morhaime - News at GameSpot Oh hey, proof. GS: What happened with Starcraft: Ghost? MM: We were late to market with a game that was not shaping up to be competitive to some of the other top games that were coming out. We looked at it and realized that there was an awful lot of work we needed to do. Our window was closing on the older-generation platforms, so we had to make a decision whether we would basically take what we'd done onto the next generation of hardware and start from scratch. Ideally, we wanted to release Ghost on the older generation and have our sequel come out on next-generation systems. And then we looked at all the resource needs we had on the PC side of the business with World of Warcraft and our other titles, and we just decided that the resources were spent better on focusing our efforts on our PC titles, so we put Ghost on indefinite hold. GS: Is cracking back into the console market still on the company's list of objectives? MM: It is not. GS: Why was the console market worth getting into in the last generation, but now you're backing away from it? MM: We thought we would be able to do it without impacting our PC teams. We just had to make a priority call when it became clear that we were getting late to the market with these things, and we were not creating something that would live up to the Blizzard quality I've been talking about without additional resources. Now it's pretty clear that we really could use those resources helping us out on World of Warcraft and other things. Ideally, you try to do everything, but one of my points this morning was about not trying to do everything at the same time and focusing on what's important. And that's what we did.
